ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2020
Predictive value of biochemical and hematological markers in prognosis of asphyxic infants.
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post Mortem Molecular Biomarkers of Asphyxia: A Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A New Cell Model Overexpressing sTGFBR3 for Studying Alzheimer's DiseaseCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2024Article
- The Application Value of Combined Detection of Serum IL-6, LDH, S100, NSE, and GFAP in the Early Diagnosis of Brain Damage Caused by Neonatal Asphyxia.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsphyxia is one of the main causes of infant mortality and long-term neurologic complications. This cohort study was aimed to compare the diagnostic value of the hematologic and biochemical factors in the prediction of prognosis of asphyxia according to the high prevalence of asphyxia and its complications.
methodsIn this cohort with a two-year follow-up study with availability sampling, 196 term asphyxic infants were involved from 2009 to 2018. A researcher-designed questionnaire was used as the data collection tool containing infantile and maternal particulars as well as the clinical and laboratory assessments. Serum levels of interleukin-1β(IL-1β), IL-6, pro-oxidant/antioxidant balance (PAB), heat shock protein (HSP) and nucleated red blood cells (NRBC) were checked in infants with perinatal asphyxia. Denver II developmental screening test (DDST-II) was performed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 month post-discharge follow-up visits. Data analysis for comparison of infants with normal and abnormal outcomes was performed using student t- test, chi-square, ROC curve, and regression models.
resultsIL-6, IL-1β, PAB, and NRBC count are among the most important predictors of abnormal complications in asphyxic newborns. PAB>22 (HK) showed sensitivity and specificity of 88.6% and 71.6%, respectively in the prediction of complications of asphyxia. The sensitivity and specificity of an IL-6 higher than 28 (pg/mL) in the prediction of complications of asphyxia were found to be 96.1% and 78.6%, respectively. Elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-1β were associated with increased unfavorable outcomes.
conclusionCombinations of: IL-1β+ IL-6 + NRBC; IL-6 + HIE grade + PAB; and IL-6+ HIE grade + NRBC had the highest predictive value (100%) for prognosis of asphyxic infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.