Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680202›Full record

ArticleEurope's journal of psychology2020

What About Fertility Staff Emotions? An Explorative Analysis of Healthcare Professionals' Subjective Perspective.

Fabiola Fedele, Andrea Caputo, Barbara Cordella, Ludovico Muzii, Daniela Pietrangeli, Cesare Aragona, Viviana Langher

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europe's journal of psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabiola FedeleDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andrea CaputoDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Barbara CordellaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ludovico MuziiDepartment of Gynecologic-Obstetrical and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Daniela PietrangeliDepartment of Gynecologic-Obstetrical and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Cesare AragonaDepartment of Gynecologic-Obstetrical and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Viviana LangherDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility-related psychological research is traditionally oriented to analyze the wellbeing of couples undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), than to study the job-related effects on the healthcare fertility staff. This piece of research aims at understanding the subjective perspective of the fertility professionals and contribute to identify their emotional dynamics in their work environment. An in-depth explorative research study was conducted on 12 healthcare professionals of an Italian ART hospital clinic. Structured interviews with open-ended questions were administered to explore their deep feelings about their professional experience. Emotional text analysis was then conducted to analyze the textual corpus of their narratives to grasp their affective symbolizations. Statistical multidimensional techniques were used to detect some thematic domains (cluster analysis) and latent factors organizing the contraposition between them (multiple correspondence analysis). Five thematic domains were detected which refer to different emotional dimensions, as follows: performance anxiety (Cluster 1), ambivalence between omnipotence and powerlessness (Cluster 2), care burden (Cluster 3), feeling of duty (Cluster 4), and sense of interdependence (Cluster 5). Then, four latent factors were identified dealing with the laborious attempt to remedy, the realistic sense of limitation, the incumbent feeling of pressure and the restorative sense of justice, respectively. The results are discussed based on the existing literature and some useful recommendations for staff education, training and clinical supervision are provided accordingly.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologyemotional text analysishealthcare professionalsinfertilitystaff’s narratives

Identifiers

PMID33680202
PMCPMC7909494
OpenAlexW3108206320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.