Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680076›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2021

Impact of immunohistochemical profile changes following neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Gabriela Candás, Alejandra García, María Delfina Ocampo, Ernesto Korbenfeld, H Daniel Vuoto, Juan Isetta, Lucas Cogorno, Agustina González Zimmermann, Marca Sigal, Santiago Acevedo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriela CandásBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Alejandra GarcíaBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
María Delfina OcampoBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Ernesto KorbenfeldOncology Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
H Daniel VuotoBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Juan IsettaBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Lucas CogornoBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Agustina González ZimmermannBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Marca SigalBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Santiago AcevedoBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Julia BerwartBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Martín NaveiraOncology Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Agustina BemiBreast Care Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Juan Luis UriburuHead of the Mastology Service, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina.
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently, the indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing in the treatment of breast cancer. Variability in the expression of biomarkers following neoadjuvant treatment has been observed, which could be accompanied by changes in the adjuvant treatment.

objectivesThe primary objective was to evaluate the variability of biomarkers prior to and following neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary objectives were to determine which tumour subtype (as determined by immunohistochemical markers) most frequently achieved pathological complete response (pCR); whether the biomarker variation resulted in a change in immunophenotype and subsequently modification to the adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective observational analysis was carried out on patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who had neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery in the Breast Care Service of the Buenos Aires British Hospital between January 2009 and June 2020.

resultsOne hundred and seventy-two patients were included. The pCR rate was 28.5%. The tumour immunophenotype that achieved pCR most frequently was the hormone receptor negative /HER2+ group with a value of 85.2%. The analysis was carried out on the 123 patients with residual disease. The observed variability for oestrogen receptors (ER) was 8.9%, for progesterone receptors (PR), 29.9% and for HER2, 13.8%. These changes were statistically significant. There were changes to the tumour immunophenotype in 26 cases (21.1%) with modifications to the adjuvant treatment in nine of these (34.6%; 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease).

conclusionsIn this study, we observed statistically significant variability in the expression of ER, PR and HER2 prior to and following neoadjuvant treatment, which identified modifications in the tumour immunophenotype in 21.1%, and changes to the adjuvant treatment in 7.3% of all tumours with residual disease, justifying the re-assay of biomarkers in the surgical specimen.

Indexed as

adjuvantHER2hormonal receptorsneoadjuvantpathological complete responsevariability

Identifiers

PMID33680076
PMCPMC7929771
OpenAlexW3120425680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.