Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680065›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Efficacy of Longdan Xiegan Decoction on the Treatment of Eczema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ziteng Hu, Lidong Gao, Chengxian Li, Alberto Cucco, Shang Wang, Weiling Yuan, Fan Zhang, Shuai Kang, Min Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziteng HuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7488-6076
Lidong GaoTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-2627
Chengxian LiTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1991-6874
Alberto CuccoTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1914-4859
Shang WangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-9531
Weiling YuanTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4728-1538
Fan ZhangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-3768
Shuai KangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-9512
Min WangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-9269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongdan Xiegan decoction (LDXGD) has been widely used in the treatment of eczema. In recent years, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LDXGD for the treatment of eczema have gradually increased. Most of the results show that LDXGD is effective in treating eczema. However, whether these conclusions are reliable or not requires meta-analysis.

objectiveThis study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of LDXGD in the treatment of eczema. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeven electronic databases, including PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature on Disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) were systematically searched from their inception until January 2021. Risk of bias was assessed using criteria from the Cochrane Collaboration and meta-analysis was conducted on the screened literature data using Review Manage (RevMan 5.3). Then, to assess the quality of evidence, the GRADE criteria was adopted.

results14 RCTs with 1080 participants were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with western medicine (WM), the cure rate and the total effective rate of LDXGD in treating eczema were higher. Meanwhile, the recurrence rate and the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-

conclusionThe clinical efficacy of LDXGD in the treatment of eczema was more effective compared with the one of conventional WM alone. However, due to the limitation of the quality of the included studies, additional studies are required to further confirm these results.

Identifiers

PMID33680065
PMCPMC7906809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.