ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021
Variability of Practice, Information Processing, and Decision Making-How Much Do We Know?
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroencephalography in motor decision-making: a scoping review in athletes.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- A minimal recurrent neural network models the robustness of interleaved practice on motor sequence learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stroboscopic visual training in basketball: a narrative review integrating cross-sport evidence and a hypothetical framework based on the information processing model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of an On-Field Rehabilitation framework for return to sports in injured male professional football players: a single-blinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
- The role of the opponent's head in perception of kick target location in martial arts.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Cognition in elite soccer players: a general model.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Applying different levels of practice variability for motor learning: More is not better.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Motor-cognitive exercise with variability of practice and feedback improves functional ability and cognition in older individuals.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Decision making influences movement variability and performance of high-level female football players in an elastic resistance task.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Use of variable online visual feedback to optimize sensorimotor coding and learning of a motor sequence.PloS one · 2023Article
- Neuroplasticity in Motor Learning Under Variable and Constant Practice Conditions-Protocol of Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Assessment of water safety competencies: Benefits and caveats of testing in open water.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Commentary: Variability of Practice, Information Processing, and Decision Making-How Much Do We Know?Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-making is a complex action requiring efficient information processing. Specifically, in movement in which performance efficiency depends on reaction time, e.g., open-loop controlled movements, these processes may play a crucial role. Information processing includes three distinct stages, stimulus identification, response selection, and response programming. Mainly, response selection may play a substantial contribution to the reaction time and appropriate decision making. The duration of this stage depends on the number of possible choices an individual has to "screen" to make a proper decision. Given that reaction time is crucial in many sports, the possibilities of reducing it through practice are very tempting. The information processing and its relationship to the manner an individual is practicing are discussed. Especially the variability of practice issues will be explored. In variable practice conditions, an individual has to react to one or more stimuli and has to produce one of the many variations of the same movement or different movements they learned. One has to identify a stimulus appropriately and has to select a response optimally, i.e., choosing from as few choices as possible to reduce the reaction time. On the other hand, in constant practice conditions, an individual can be exposed to one or many stimuli. Still, there is only one variation of the movement that can be executed in the presence of a learned stimulus. Based on the information processing theory and the results of the research focusing on variability of practice, I discuss how the practice conditions may affect reaction time and, as a result, the decision-making process. I conceptually frame the possible implications of practice conditions on decision making related to information processing. In this review, a possible mechanism and relationship between practice conditions and decision-making are presented. Future research directions are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.