ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Classification of Drivers' Workload Using Physiological Signals in Conditional Automation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of In-Vehicle Physiological Indices and Sensor Technology for Driver Mental Workload Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Dataset of physiological signals in the use of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS).Data in brief · 2026Article
- Predicting driver fatigue using HRV measures and machine learning.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Cognitive state monitoring for neuroadaptive information visualization.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Identifying neural correlates of cognitive workload in high-performance motorsport simulation: an integrated EEG and telemetry analysis of driver performance.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Unobtrusive Biosensing in Intelligent Vehicles: Sensors, Algorithms, and Integration Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A prediction model for the oceanauts' cognitive performance based on the mental workload of typical tasks.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Expert-Novice Level Classification Using Graph Convolutional Network Introducing Confidence-Aware Node-Level Attention Mechanism.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Measuring aviator workload using EEG: an individualized approach to workload manipulation.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2024Article
- Drivers' Mental Engagement Analysis Using Multi-Sensor Fusion Approaches Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A dataset on the physiological state and behavior of drivers in conditionally automated driving.Data in brief · 2023Article
- Behavior and Task Classification Using Wearable Sensor Data: A Study across Different Ages.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Validity of Physiological Measures to Identify Differences in Intrinsic Cognitive Load.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of automation in cars is increasing. In future vehicles, drivers will no longer be in charge of the main driving task and may be allowed to perform a secondary task. However, they might be requested to regain control of the car if a hazardous situation occurs (i.e., conditionally automated driving). Performing a secondary task might increase drivers' mental workload and consequently decrease the takeover performance if the workload level exceeds a certain threshold. Knowledge about the driver's mental state might hence be useful for increasing safety in conditionally automated vehicles. Measuring drivers' workload continuously is essential to support the driver and hence limit the number of accidents in takeover situations. This goal can be achieved using machine learning techniques to evaluate and classify the drivers' workload in real-time. To evaluate the usefulness of physiological data as an indicator for workload in conditionally automated driving, three physiological signals from 90 subjects were collected during 25 min of automated driving in a fixed-base simulator. Half of the participants performed a verbal cognitive task to induce mental workload while the other half only had to monitor the environment of the car. Three classifiers, sensor fusion and levels of data segmentation were compared. Results show that the best model was able to successfully classify the condition of the driver with an accuracy of 95%. In some cases, the model benefited from sensors' fusion. Increasing the segmentation level (e.g., size of the time window to compute physiological indicators) increased the performance of the model for windows smaller than 4 min, but decreased for windows larger than 4 min. In conclusion, the study showed that a high level of drivers' mental workload can be accurately detected while driving in conditional automation based on 4-min recordings of respiration and skin conductance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.