Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33679448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

Responses to Maximal Strength Training in Different Age and Gender Groups.

Hans Torvild Kittilsen, Sannija Goleva-Fjellet, Baard Ingegerdsson Freberg, Iver Nicolaisen, Eva Maria Støa, Solfrid Bratland-Sanda, Jan Helgerud, Eivind Wang, Mona Sæbø, Øyvind Støren

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hans Torvild KittilsenDepartment of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Sannija Goleva-FjelletDepartment of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Baard Ingegerdsson FrebergDepartment of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Iver NicolaisenDepartment of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Eva Maria StøaDepartment of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Solfrid Bratland-SandaDepartment of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Jan HelgerudDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Eivind WangDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Mona SæbøDepartment of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.
Øyvind StørenDepartment of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to investigate the potential impact of age, gender, baseline strength, and selected candidate polymorphisms on maximal strength training (MST) adaptations.

methodsA total of 49 subjects (22 men and 27 women) aged 20-76 years, divided into five age groups, completed an 8 weeks MST intervention. Each MST session consisted of 4 sets with 4 repetitions at ∼85-90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) intensity in leg-press, three times per week. 1RM was tested pre and post the intervention and blood samples were drawn to genotype candidate polymorphisms

resultsAll age groups increased leg-press 1RM (

conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report improvement in leg-press maximal strength regardless of gender, baseline strength status in all age groups. The present study is also first to demonstrate an association between the

Indexed as

agingbaseline strengthgendergene polymorphismsleg-presstraining adaptations

Identifiers

PMID33679448
PMCPMC7925619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.