Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33679351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

7T MRI and Computational Modeling Supports a Critical Role of Lead Location in Determining Outcomes for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Case Report.

Lauren E Schrock, Remi Patriat, Mojgan Goftari, Jiwon Kim, Matthew D Johnson, Noam Harel, Jerrold L Vitek

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren E SchrockDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Remi PatriatCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Mojgan GoftariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jiwon KimDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Matthew D JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Noam HarelCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jerrold L VitekDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Pathophysiology-based approaches to deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's diseaseP50NS098573 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI JOHNSON, MATTHEW DOUGLAS · 2016 to 2020
$9.1M
Spatiotemporal Optimization of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's DiseaseR01NS094206 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Matthew Douglas Johnson, THEODEN I NETOFF · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
Institutional Center Cores for Advanced NeuroimagingP30NS076408 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2020
$4.2M
Algorithms for programming deep brain stimulation systemsR01NS081118 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAREL, NOAM, JOHNSON, MATTHEW DOUGLAS · 2012 to 2023
$4.0M
Corticosubthalamic Plasticity in the Parkinsonian StateR01NS113746 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HAREL, NOAM, MACKINNON, COLUM D · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS076408NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS098573NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081118NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094206NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease motor symptoms. The ideal site for implantation within STN, however, remains controversial. While many argue that placement of a DBS lead within the sensorimotor territory of the STN yields better motor outcomes, others report similar effects with leads placed in the associative or motor territory of the STN, while still others assert that placing a DBS lead "anywhere within a 6-mm-diameter cylinder centered at the presumed middle of the STN (based on stereotactic atlas coordinates) produces similar clinical efficacy." These discrepancies likely result from methodological differences including targeting preferences, imaging acquisition and the use of brain atlases that do not account for patient-specific anatomic variability. We present a first-in-kind within-patient demonstration of severe mood side effects and minimal motor improvement in a Parkinson's disease patient following placement of a DBS lead in the limbic/associative territory of the STN who experienced marked improvement in motor benefit and resolution of mood side effects following repositioning the lead within the STN sensorimotor territory. 7 Tesla (7 T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were used to generate a patient-specific anatomical model of the STN with parcellation into distinct functional territories and computational modeling to assess the relative degree of activation of motor, associative and limbic territories.

Indexed as

case reportcomputational modelingdeep brain stimulationelectrode locationParkinson’s diseasesubthalamic nucleusultra-high field MRI

Identifiers

PMID33679351
PMCPMC7928296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.