The Neurophysiological Impact of Experimentally-Induced Pain on Direct Muscle Spindle Afferent Response: A Scoping Review.

Carla R Lima, Pradeep K Sahu, Daniel F Martins, William R Reed

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review

In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

Assessment of ipsilateral and contralateral perfusion after contrast compression therapy of upper limb muscles in MMA athletes - a cross-over study.Frontiers in physiology · 2024
Article
Comparison and correlation of cervical proprioception and muscle endurance in general joint hypermobility participants with and without non-specific neck pain-a cross-sectional study.PeerJ · 2022
Article
Influence of Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level on Immediate Post-Spinal Manipulation Trunk Muscle Spindle Response in an Animal Model.Brain sciences · 2021
Article
Efficacy of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation versus Whole Body Vibration for Spasticity Reduction in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Carla R LimaRehabilitation Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Pradeep K SahuNeurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Daniel F MartinsPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Brazil.

William R ReedDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

University of Alabama at Birmingham · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

Proprioceptive mechanisms underlying post-spinal manipulation response in an NGF-induced low back pain modelR21AT010517 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI REED, WILLIAM RAY · 2019 to 2020

$407k

NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT010517

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

afferentfusimotormusclemuscle painmuscle spindlepainscoping review

Identifiers

PMID33679333

DOI10.3389/fncel.2021.649529

PMCPMC7933477

OpenAlexW3132693191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.