ArticleSIAM journal on applied dynamical systems2019
Comparison of Combinatorial Signatures of Global Network Dynamics Generated by Two Classes of ODE Models.
Article in SIAM journal on applied dynamical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint Realizability of Monotone Boolean Functions.Theoretical computer science · 2022Article
- Mixture distributions in a stochastic gene expression model with delayed feedback: a WKB approximation approach.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020Article
- Multi-parameter exploration of dynamics of regulatory networks.Bio Systems · 2020Review
- Multistability in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition network.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- DSGRN: Examining the Dynamics of Families of Logical Models.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling the dynamics of biological networks introduces many challenges, among them the lack of first principle models, the size of the networks, and difficulties with parameterization. Discrete time Boolean networks and related continuous time switching systems provide a computationally accessible way to translate the structure of the network to predictions about the dynamics. Recent work has shown that the parameterized dynamics of switching systems can be captured by a combinatorial object, called a Dynamic Signatures Generated by Regulatory Networks (DSGRN) database, that consists of a parameter graph characterizing a finite parameter space decomposition, whose nodes are assigned a Morse graph that captures global dynamics for all corresponding parameters. We show that for a given network there is a way to associate the same type of object by considering a continuous time ODE system with a continuous right-hand side, which we call an L-system. The main goal of this paper is to compare the two DSGRN databases for the same network. Since the L-systems can be thought of as perturbations (not necessarily small) of the switching systems, our results address the correspondence between global parameterized dynamics of switching systems and their perturbations. We show that, at corresponding parameters, there is an order preserving map from the Morse graph of the switching system to that of the L-system that is surjective on the set of attractors and bijective on the set of fixed-point attractors. We provide important examples showing why this correspondence cannot be strengthened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.