Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678841›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry

Assessment of lithium-related knowledge and attitudes among patients with bipolar disorder on long-term lithium maintenance treatment.

Saurabh Kumar, Swarndeep Singh, Pankaj Mahal, Anuranjan Vishwakarma, Raman Deep

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of an Essential Information Set for Supporting Life With Bipolar Disorder: A Modified Delphi Study With Patients, Families and Healthcare Professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saurabh KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Swarndeep SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pankaj MahalDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anuranjan VishwakarmaDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Raman DeepDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaps in lithium-related knowledge among bipolar disorder (BD) patients on lithium prophylaxis may pose safety concerns and could adversely influence attitudes to lithium.

objectiveTo assess the lithium-related knowledge and attitudes among patients with BD. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, observational study assessing euthymic, adult outpatients with BD on lithium prophylaxis (≥1 year) using a semi-structured pro forma, lithium questionnaire for knowledge, lithium attitude questionnaire (LAQ), and medication adherence rating scale (MARS).

resultsDescriptive analysis revealed several deficits in knowledge, including lack of critical safety information or need for periodic blood tests. Lower knowledge group had significantly more negative attitudes. Favorable attitude toward lithium (lower LAQ score) was significantly associated with the number of psychiatric follow-ups in the last year and MARS score.

conclusionThere were critical deficits in lithium-related knowledge among the patients. Lower lithium knowledge was associated with negative lithium attitudes. Educative interventions should be delivered periodically to regular lithium users.

Indexed as

Attitudebipolar disorderIndiaknowledgelithium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.