Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678765›Full record

ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2021

Association of the Estimated Coronary Artery Incidence Risk According to the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines 2017 with Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index.

Mizuki Sata, Tomonori Okamura, Sei Harada, Daisuke Sugiyama, Kazuyo Kuwabara, Aya Hirata, Ayano Takeuchi, Miho Iida, Suzuka Kato, Minako Matsumoto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mizuki SataDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Tomonori OkamuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Sei HaradaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Daisuke SugiyamaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Kazuyo KuwabaraDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Aya HirataDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Ayano TakeuchiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Miho IidaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Suzuka KatoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Minako MatsumotoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Ayako KuriharaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Toru TakebayashiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe categories in the comprehensive lipid and risk management guidelines were proposed by the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS Guidelines 2017), which adopted the estimated 10 year absolute risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) incidence in the Suita score. We examined whether those categories were concordant with the degree of arterial stiffness.

methodsIn 2014, the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), an arterial stiffness parameter, was measured in 1,972 Japanese participants aged 35-74 years in Tsuruoka City, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. We examined the mean CAVI and the proportion and odds ratios (ORs) of CAVI ≥ 9.0 on the basis of the following three management classifications using the analysis of variance and logistic regression: "Category I (Low risk)," "Category II (Middle risk)," and "Category III (High risk)."

resultsThe mean CAVI and proportion of CAVI ≥ 9.0 were 8.6 and 34.8% among males and 8.1 and 18.3% among females, respectively. The mean CAVI and proportion of CAVI ≥ 9.0 were associated with an estimated 10 year absolute risk for CAD among males and females, excluding High risk for females. These results were similar to the management classification by the guideline: the multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals) of CAVI ≥ 9.0 among Category II and Category III compared with those among Category I were 2.96 (1.61-5.43) and 7.33 (4.03-13.3) for males and 3.99 (2.55-6.24) and 3.34 (2.16-5.16) for females, respectively.

conclusionsThe risk stratification, which was proposed in the JAS Guidelines 2017, is concordant with the arterial stiffness parameter.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsRisk AssessmentCardio Ankle Vascular IndexFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansIncidenceJapanMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicVascular StiffnessAbsolute riskCardio-ankle vascular indexCoronary artery diseaseJAS GuidelinesRisk score

Identifiers

PMID33678765
PMCPMC8629702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.