Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678596›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2021

Acceptability of a patient decision aid for women aged 70 and older with stage I, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Christina A Minami, Rachel A Freedman, Maria Karamourtopoulos, Adlin Pinheiro, Elizabeth Gilliam, Gianna Aliberti, Susan E Pories, Abram Recht, Margaret Lotz, Laura S Dominici and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06896474 (SDM POSSIBLE), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06896474 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

SDM POSSIBLE: A Cluster RCT of a Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Aid for Women 70+ With Low-Risk Stage I Breast Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2026 to 2033Enrolled402ConditionsBreast CancerArmsShared Decision-Making Training and Decision Aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina A MinamiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Rachel A FreedmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Maria KaramourtopoulosBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Adlin PinheiroBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Elizabeth GilliamBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Gianna AlibertiBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Susan E PoriesMount Auburn Hospital, 300 Mount Auburn Street, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Abram RechtBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Margaret LotzMount Auburn Hospital, 300 Mount Auburn Street, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Laura S DominiciBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Mara A SchonbergBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: mschonbe@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USMount Auburn Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Research and mentoring program in shared decision making in the care of older adultsK24AG071906 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHONBERG, MARA A · 2021 to 2025
$946k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG071906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA comprehensive decision aid (DA) for women ≥70 years with Stage I ER+/HER2-negative breast cancer was developed to support locoregional and systemic treatment decision-making. We aimed to test the acceptability of this novel DA in women newly-diagnosed with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWomen ≥70 diagnosed with Stage I, ER+/HER2- breast cancer were recruited from three Boston-area hospitals. They underwent baseline interviews after initial surgical consultation, reviewed the DA, and were surveyed <2 weeks later to determine DA acceptability (e.g., was it helpful?), changes in decisional conflict, stage of decision-making, and knowledge. Participants could optionally complete a three-month follow-up. Paired t-tests and McNemar's tests were used for statistical comparisons, and thematic analyses were conducted to identify themes in participants' open-ended comments.

resultsThirty-three of 56 eligible patients approached completed the baseline and acceptability surveys, and 25 completed the three-month follow-up. Participants' mean age was 74.7 years (±3.8). Nearly all participants (n = 31, 94%) strongly agreed that the DA was helpful and felt that the DA prepared them for treatment decision-making, with a mean decision preparation score of 4.1 (out of 5.0); 6% (n = 2) found it very anxiety provoking. Knowledge improved with a mean of 9.0 out of 14 questions correct at baseline to 10.6 correct on the acceptability survey (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsA DA tailored to women ≥70 with Stage I, ER+, HER2- breast cancer increased knowledge and was perceived to be helpful by older women. A randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansReceptors, EstrogenSurveys and QuestionnairesReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerDecision aidEarly-stageHormone receptor-positiveOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID33678596
PMCPMC12744910
OpenAlexW3133862865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.