Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678232›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine2021

National implementation of HPV vaccination programs in low-resource countries: Lessons, challenges, and future prospects.

Vivien D Tsu, D Scott LaMontagne, Phionah Atuhebwe, Paul N Bloem, Cathy Ndiaye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Country readiness in responding to COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Events (VREs) in Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vivien D TsuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA. Electronic address: vtsu@uw.edu.
D Scott LaMontagneCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, USA. Electronic address: slamontagne@path.org.
Phionah AtuhebweAfrica Regional Office, World Health Organization, Brazzaville, Congo. Electronic address: atuhebwep@who.int.
Paul N BloemLife Course and Integration/EPI, Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: bloemp@who.int.
Cathy NdiayePATH, Dakar, Senegal. Electronic address: cndiaye@path.org.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 90% of cervical cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which have limited capacity to mount the comprehensive national screening and precancer treatment programs that could prevent most of these deaths. The development of vaccines against the human papillomavirus (HPV) has dramatically altered the landscape of cervical cancer prevention. As of mid-2020, 56 LMICs (41% of all LMICs) have initiated national HPV vaccination programs. This paper reviews the experience of LMICs that have introduced HPV vaccine into their national programs, key lessons learned, HPV vaccination sustainability and scale-up challenges, and future mitigation measures. As international guidance evolved and countries accumulated experience, strategies for national introduction shifted with regard to target groups, delivery site and timing, preparation and planning, communications and social mobilization, and ultimately monitoring, supervision and evaluation. Despite the successes that LMICs have been able to achieve in reaching large proportions of eligible girls, there are still considerable challenges countries encounter in overcoming rumors, reaching out-of-school girls, completing the vaccine series, estimating target populations, monitoring program performance, and assuring vaccination sustainability. New opportunities, such as the entry of additional vaccine manufacturers and ongoing studies to evaluate one-dose delivery, could help overcome the outstanding barriers to higher coverage and financial sustainability. Effective use of the experience to date and advances on the horizon could enable all LMICs to move towards the coverage levels that are needed to achieve eventual elimination.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesHPV vaccinationImplementationLow and middle-income countriesNational introduction

Identifiers

PMID33678232
PMCPMC7957340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.