Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678179›Full record

Trial reportBMC palliative care2021

No difference in effects of 'PACE steps to success' palliative care program for nursing home residents with and without dementia: a pre-planned subgroup analysis of the seven-country PACE trial.

Rose Miranda, Tinne Smets, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Jenny T van der Steen, Luc Deliens, Sheila Payne, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Sophie Pautex, Liesbeth Van Humbeeck, Giovanni Gambassi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Palliative Care in Early Dementia.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Rose MirandaVrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. rose.miranda@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-6548
Tinne SmetsVrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Nele Van Den NoortgateDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jenny T van der SteenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Luc DeliensVrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Sheila PayneInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Katarzyna SzczerbińskaLaboratory for Research on Aging Society, Department of Sociology of Medicine, Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Chair, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Sophie PautexHôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Liesbeth Van HumbeeckDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Giovanni GambassiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marika KylänenNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Lieve Van den BlockVrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
PACE
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BELeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Geneva · CHJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

FP7 Health 603111H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 676265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'PACE Steps to Success' is a multicomponent training program aiming to integrate generalist and non-disease-specific palliative care in nursing homes. This program did not improve residents' comfort in the last week of life, but it appeared to improve quality of care and dying in their last month of life. Because this program included only three dementia-specific elements, its effects might differ depending on the presence or stage of dementia. We aimed to investigate whether the program effects differ between residents with advanced, non-advanced, and no dementia.

methodsPre-planned subgroup analysis of the PACE cluster-randomized controlled trial in 78 nursing homes in seven European countries. Participants included residents who died in the previous 4 months. The nursing home staff or general practitioner assessed the presence of dementia; severity was determined using two highly-discriminatory staff-reported instruments. Using after-death questionnaires, staff assessed comfort in the last week of life (Comfort Assessment in Dying-End-of-Life in Dementia-scale; primary outcome) and quality of care and dying in the last month of life (Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care scale; secondary outcome).

resultsAt baseline, we included 177 residents with advanced dementia, 126 with non-advanced dementia and 156 without dementia. Post-intervention, respectively in the control and the intervention group, we included 136 and 104 residents with advanced dementia, 167 and 110 with non-advanced dementia and 157 and 137 without dementia. We found no subgroup differences on comfort in the last week of life, comparing advanced versus without dementia (baseline-adjusted mean sub-group difference 2.1; p-value = 0.177), non-advanced versus without dementia (2.7; p = 0.092), and advanced versus non-advanced dementia (- 0.6; p = 0.698); or on quality of care and dying in the last month of life, comparing advanced and without dementia (- 0.6; p = 0.741), non-advanced and without dementia (- 1.5; p = 0.428), and advanced and non-advanced dementia (0.9; p = 0.632).

conclusionsThe lack of subgroup difference suggests that while the program did not improve comfort in dying residents with or without dementia, it appeared to equally improve quality of care and dying in the last month of life for residents with dementia (regardless of the stage) and those without dementia. A generalist and non-disease-specific palliative care program, such as PACE Steps to Success, is a useful starting point for future palliative care improvement in nursing homes, but to effectively improve residents' comfort, this program needs further development.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN14741671 . Registered 8 July 2015 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

DementiaHospice and Palliative Care NursingTerminal CareHumansNursing HomesPalliative CareBereavementCommunicationEnd of life careNeurological conditionsNursing home carePain

Identifiers

PMID33678179
PMCPMC7937240
OpenAlexW3134381687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.