Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678167›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study.

Ahmed Othman, Steven Hartman, Dragan Ströbele, Jassin Arnold, von See

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed OthmanDigital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM Department, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria. ahmed.othman@dp-uni.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-7944
Steven HartmanDigital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM Department, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Dragan StröbeleDigital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM Department, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Jassin ArnoldDigital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM Department, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
von SeeDigital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM Department, Danube Private University, Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500, Krems an der Donau, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the presented investigation is to evaluate the resulting torque on loaded 3D printed springs using different coil thickness and length.

methodsSpecimens were designed and printed using the 3D printer MAX (Asiga, Sydney, Australia) with 3D printable, experimental, flexible material (Code:BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided into three groups according to spring coil design. Control group (n = 18), length group (n = 19) and thickness group (n = 22). Groups were tested using a Sauter Machine for torque calculation (DB, Grindelwald, Switzerland) in conjunction with a universal testing machine (Zwick Z010, Ulm, Germany) for clock-wise and anti-clockwise testing. Statistical analysis was performed using the Steel-Dwass test to compare median values of the three groups in both testing directions (p < 0.001).

resultsThe highest torque value was determined in the thickness group for both clockwise and anti-clockwise testing directions, achieving 44.00 N/mm and 39.62 N/mm respectively. The length group ranged from 21.65 to 11.04 N/mm in clockwise direction and from 18.04 to 11.38 N/mm in counter-clockwise testing. The control group ranged from 22.72 to 17.18 N/mm in the clock-wise direction while in the anti-clock wise testing it ranged from 21.34 to 16.02 N/mm.

conclusionsThe amount of torque produced from the computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) springs is being affected by diameter more than the length design parameter in comparison to the control group. The values of the thickness group are significantly higher than those of the length group (P < 0.001).

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignPrinting, Three-DimensionalAustraliaFeasibility StudiesGermanyHumansJapanMaterials TestingSwitzerlandTorque3D printingCAD/CAMDigital orthodonticsSpringsTorque

Identifiers

PMID33678167
PMCPMC7938560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.