ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021
The neonatal assessment manual score (NAME) for improving the clinical management of infants: a perspective validity study.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- From touch to triage: translating the NAME model into clinical practice for enhanced neonatal assessment.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Impact of touch interventions on brain activity in moderately preterm infants: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Newborns' clinical conditions are correlated with the neonatal assessment manual scorE (NAME).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- The Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE: A Reliability Study on Hospitalized Neonates.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe Neonatal Assessment Manual scorE (NAME) was developed to assist in the clinical management of infants in the neonatal ward by assessing their body's compliance and homogeneity. The present study begins its validation process.
methodsAn expert panel of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals investigated the NAME face and content validity. Content validity was assessed through the content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was assessed using data collected from 50 newborns hospitalized in the NICU of "Vittore Buzzi" Children Hospital of Milan, Italy. Kendall's τ and ordinal logistic regressions were used to evaluate the correlation between the NAME scores and infants' gestational age, birth weight, post-menstrual age, weight at the time of assessment, and a complexity index related to organic complications.
resultsThe CVIs for compliance, homogeneity, and the whole scale were respectively 1, 0.9, and 0.95. Construct validity analysis showed significant positive correlations between the NAME and infants' weight and age, and a negative correlation between the NAME and the complexity index (τ = - 0.31 [95% IC: - 0.47, - 0.12], p = 0.016 and OR = 0.56 [95% IC: 0.32, 0.94], p = 0.034 for categorical NAME; τ = - 0.32 [95% IC: - 0.48, - 0.14], p = 0.005 for numerical NAME).
conclusionsThe NAME was well accepted by NICU professionals in this study and it demonstrates good construct validity in discriminating the infant's general condition. Future studies are needed to test the NAME reliability and predictive capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.