Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33678022›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Oxidative stress and senescence in social insects: a significant but inconsistent link?

Boris H Kramer, Volker Nehring, Anja Buttstedt, Jürgen Heinze, Judith Korb, Romain Libbrecht, Karen Meusemann, Robert J Paxton, Alice Séguret, Florentine Schaub and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Transgenerational epigenetic effect of kings' aging on offspring's caste fate mediated by sperm DNA methylation in termites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Boris H KramerFaculty of Science and Engineering, Theoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences, RUG, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Volker NehringDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, 79104 Freiburg (Brsg.), Germany.
Anja ButtstedtInstitute for Biology - Molecular Ecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Saale, Hoher Weg 4, 06099 Halle, Germany.
Jürgen HeinzeZoology, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Judith KorbDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, 79104 Freiburg (Brsg.), Germany.
Romain LibbrechtInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (IOME), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Karen MeusemannDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, 79104 Freiburg (Brsg.), Germany.
Robert J PaxtonInstitute for Biology - General Zoology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120 Halle, Germany.
Alice SéguretInstitute for Biology - General Zoology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120 Halle, Germany.
Florentine SchaubDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, 79104 Freiburg (Brsg.), Germany.
Abel BernadouZoology, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The life-prolonging effects of antioxidants have long entered popular culture, but the scientific community still debates whether free radicals and the resulting oxidative stress negatively affect longevity. Social insects are intriguing models for analysing the relationship between oxidative stress and senescence because life histories differ vastly between long-lived reproductives and the genetically similar but short-lived workers. Here, we present the results of an experiment on the accumulation of oxidative damage to proteins, and a comparative analysis of the expression of 20 selected genes commonly involved in managing oxidative damage, across four species of social insects: a termite, two bees and an ant. Although the source of analysed tissue varied across the four species, our results suggest that oxidative stress is a significant factor in senescence and that its manifestation and antioxidant defenses differ among species, making it difficult to find general patterns. More detailed and controlled investigations on why responses to oxidative stress may differ across social species may lead to a better understanding of the relations between oxidative stress, antioxidants, social life history and senescence. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ageing and sociality: why, when and how does sociality change ageing patterns?'

Indexed as

AgingOxidative StressAnimalsAntioxidantsAntsBeesIsopteraSpecies SpecificityAntioxidantsageingantioxidant geneslongevityprotein oxidationsocial insectstranscriptomes

Identifiers

PMID33678022
PMCPMC7938172
OpenAlexW3133872002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.