Trial reportEndocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)2021
Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study.
Trial report in Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02791516 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab With Placebo in Postmenopausal South Korean Women With Osteoporosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab With Placebo in Postmenopausal South Korean Women With Osteoporosis
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Romosozumab's Effect on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Assessment of the efficacy and safety of anti-sclerostin antibody therapy for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of romosozumab: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2024Pooled it
- Romosozumab increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis: A randomised phase three study.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Proxied therapeutic inhibition on sclerostin and atrial fibrillation risk.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Sclerostin in Vascular Calcification: Hypoxia-Driven Regulation and Therapeutic Modulation by Natural Products.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Branched‑chain amino acid metabolism and bone metabolism: Implications for osteoporosis pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Role of Sclerostin in Cardiovascular System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Real-World Evaluation of 12-Month Romosozumab Treatment in Korean Women with Severe Osteoporosis: Potential Synergy with Hormone Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Mechanisms Underlying Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.Oral diseases · 2025Review
- Effect of precise health management combined with physical rehabilitation on bone biomarkers in senile osteoporosis patients.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Treatment effects, adverse outcomes and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab - Existing worldwide data: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Review
- Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Benefits of lumican on human bone health: clinical evidence using bone marrow aspirates.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of the Ershiwuwei Guijiu Pill in Treating Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Based on Network Analysis and Experimental Validation.Journal of evidence-based integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-month treatment with romosozumab in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
methodsSixty-seven postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] T-scores ≤-2.5 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck) were randomized (1:1) to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of romosozumab (210 mg; n=34) or placebo (n=33) for 6 months.
resultsAt month 6, the difference in the least square (LS) mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD (primary efficacy endpoint) between the romosozumab (9.5%) and placebo (-0.1%) groups was significant (9.6%; 95% confidence interval, 7.6 to 11.5; P<0.001). The difference in the LS mean percent change from baseline was also significant for total hip and femoral neck BMD (secondary efficacy endpoints). After treatment with romosozumab, the percent change from baseline in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide transiently increased at months 1 and 3, while that in C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen showed a sustained decrease. No events of cancer, hypocalcemia, injection site reaction, positively adjudicated atypical femoral fracture or osteonecrosis of the jaw, or positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular adverse events were observed. At month 9, 17.6% and 2.9% of patients in the romosozumab group developed binding and neutralizing antibodies, respectively.
conclusionTreatment with romosozumab for 6 months was well tolerated and significantly increased lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD compared with placebo in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02791516).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.