Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677808›Full record

ArticleAmbio2021

What fisher diets reveal about fish stocks.

Priscila F M Lopes, Natália Hanazaki, Elaine M Nakamura, Svetlana Salivonchyk, Alpina Begossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Priscila F M LopesDepartament of Ecology, Universidade Federal Do RioGrande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil. priscila@cb.ufrn.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-5117
Natália HanazakiDepartment of Ecology and Zoology, Biological Sciences Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Campus Universitário, Sala 009 Bloco C - Córrego Grande, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Elaine M NakamuraDepartment of Ecology and Zoology, Biological Sciences Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Campus Universitário, Sala 010 Bloco C - Córrego Grande, CEP: 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Svetlana SalivonchykInstitute for Nature Management, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.
Alpina BegossiCAPESCA, NEPA, UNICAMP SP, Rua Albert Einstein 291, Campinas, SP, 13083-852, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking fish consumption could provide additional information on changes to fish stocks, one of the planet's main protein sources. We used data on seafood consumption in fishing villages in Brazil over time to test for changes in: species richness, diversity, and composition, fish size and trophic levels, consumption of endangered species, and functional diversity (namely, species with different behavioral and habitat preferences). Our results demonstrate the potential to include this additional data source to complement fisheries data, especially in data-poor countries. With respect to Brazil specifically, we identified a decrease in both the average trophic level and size of the species consumed. While the consumption of endangered species had always been low, most of these species changed over time, thereby suggesting that many, especially elasmobranchs, may have become rare on the plates. Although it may be hard to fully isolate cultural changes from biodiversity changes when it comes to analyzing consumption data, by examining diets it is possible to identify aspects worth investigating further, such as, whether the decrease in dietary trophic levels mirrors a decrease in environmental trophic levels. In places where fisheries data are either inexistent or limited, diet track surveys, such as household expenditure programs, can help trace the changes caused by fisheries in stocks and habitats.

Indexed as

EcosystemFisheriesAnimalsBiodiversityDietEndangered SpeciesFishesFisheries indicatorsFishing down the food webFood securityTrophic level

Identifiers

PMID33677808
PMCPMC8363708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.