Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677794›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022

Mesenchymal stem cells' seeded amniotic membrane as a tissue-engineered dressing for wound healing.

Hamid Reza Aghayan, Motahareh Sheikh Hosseini, Mahdi Gholami, Fereshteh Mohamadi-Jahani, Akram Tayanloo-Beik, Sepideh Alavi-Moghadam, Moloud Payab, Parisa Goodarzi, Mohammad Abdollahi, Bagher Larijani and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Amniotic miracle: Investigating the unique development and applications of amniotic membrane in wound healing.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. DNA Damage Responses, the Trump Card of Stem Cells in the Survival Game.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamid Reza AghayanCell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8348-1449
Motahareh Sheikh HosseiniMetabolomics and Genomics Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi GholamiDepartment of Toxicology & Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy; Toxicology and Poisoning Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 1416753955, Tehran, Iran.
Fereshteh Mohamadi-JahaniBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Akram Tayanloo-BeikCell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8370-9557
Sepideh Alavi-MoghadamCell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Moloud PayabObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9311-8395
Parisa GoodarziBrain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AbdollahiToxicology and Diseases Group (TDG), Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), and Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bagher LarijaniEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-7597
Babak ArjmandCell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. barjmand@sina.tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-5006
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different biomaterials have been used as biological dressing for wound regeneration. For many decades, human amniotic membrane graft (AM) has been widely applied for treating acute and chronic wounds. It has minimal toxicity and immunogenicity, supports mesenchymal cell in-growth, improves epidermal cell adherence and proliferation, and finally is inexpensive and readily available. Enrichment of tissue grafts with the stem cells is a new approach to improve their regenerative effects. This animal study aimed at investigating feasibility, safety, and efficacy of tissue-engineered dressings composed of AM and two different types of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the excisional wound model in rats. Human adipose-derived MSCs (ADMSCs) and placenta-derived MSCs (PLMSCs) were manufactured from the donated adipose and placenta tissues respectively. After cell characterization, MSCs were seeded on acellular AM (AAM) and cultivated for 5 days. Excisional wound model was developed in 24 male Wistar rats that were randomly classified into four groups including control, AAM, ADMSCs + AAM, and PLMSCs + AAM (n = 6 in each group). Tissue-engineered constructs were applied, and photographs were taken on days 0, 7, and 14 for observing the wound healing rates. In days 7 and 14 post-treatment, three rats from each group were euthanized, and wound biopsies were harvested, and histopathologic studies were conducted. The results of wound closure rate, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, and collagen remodeling demonstrated that in comparison with the control groups, the MSC-seeded AAMs had superior regenerative effects in excisional wound animal model. Between MSCs group, the PLMSCs showed better healing effect. Our data suggested that seeding of MSCs on AAM can boosts its regenerative effects in wound treatment. We also found that PLMSCs had superior regenerative effects to ADMSc in the rat model of excisional wound.

Indexed as

AmnionMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsBandagesMaleRatsRats, WistarWound HealingAdipose tissueAmniotic membraneMesenchymal stem cellsPlacentaRegenerative medicineTissue engineeringWound

Identifiers

PMID33677794
OpenAlexW3134134992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.