Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677741›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Endoscopic surgical treatment for rhinogenic contact point headache: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Antonino Maniaci, Federico Merlino, Salvatore Cocuzza, Giannicola Iannella, Claudio Vicini, Giovanni Cammaroto, Jérome R Lechien, Christian Calvo-Henriquez, Ignazio La Mantia

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neural Crest Stem Cells in Juvenile Angiofibromas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Full-Face Mask Use during SCUBA Diving Counters Related Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Dysfunction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonino ManiaciDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", ENT Section, ENT Department of University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 95100, Catania, Italy. tnmaniaci29@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-0185
Federico MerlinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", ENT Section, ENT Department of University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 95100, Catania, Italy.
Salvatore CocuzzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", ENT Section, ENT Department of University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 95100, Catania, Italy.
Giannicola IannellaDepartment of 'Organi Di Senso', University "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Claudio ViciniDepartment of Head-Neck Surgery, Otolaryngology, Head-Neck, and Oral Surgery Unit, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Giovanni CammarotoDepartment of Head-Neck Surgery, Otolaryngology, Head-Neck, and Oral Surgery Unit, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Jérome R LechienResearch Committee of the Young Otolaryngologists, International Federations of ORL Societies, Paris, France.
Christian Calvo-HenriquezTask Force COVID-19 of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ignazio La MantiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", ENT Section, ENT Department of University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 95100, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis meta-analysis study was designed to analyze endoscopic surgery's role in treating rhinogenic contact point headache.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive review of the last 20 years' English language regarding Rhinogenic contact point headache and endoscopic surgery. We included the analysis papers reporting post-operative outcomes through the Visual Analogue Scale or the Migraine Disability Assessment scale.

resultsWe provided 18 articles for a total of 978 RCPH patients. While 777 (81.1%) subjects underwent functional nasal surgery for RCPH, 201 patients (20.9%) were medically treated. A significant decrease from the VAS score of 7.3 ± 1.5 to 2.7 ± 1.8 was recorded (p < 0.0001). At quantitative analysis on 660 patients (11 papers), surgical treatment demonstrated significantly better post-operative scores than medical (p < 0.0001).

conclusionAt comparison, surgical treatment in patients with rhinogenic contact points exhibited significantly better values at short-term, medium-term, and long term follow up. Endoscopic surgery should be proposed as the choice method in approaching the symptomatic patient.

Indexed as

HeadacheMigraine DisordersEndoscopyHumansNosePain MeasurementConcha bullosaEndoscopic surgeryRhinogenic contact point headacheSeptal deviationSeptal spur

Identifiers

PMID33677741
PMCPMC7936872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.