Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677711›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Assessment of individual molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with atypical BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts: recommendations by the EUTOS cooperative network.

Vivien Schäfer, Helen E White, Gareth Gerrard, Susanne Möbius, Susanne Saussele, Georg-Nikolaus Franke, François-X Mahon, Rodica Talmaci, Dolors Colomer, Simona Soverini and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The silent players: AtypicalOncology reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Vivien SchäferAbteilung Hämatologie/Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Helen E WhiteWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.
Gareth GerrardFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Susanne MöbiusAbteilung Hämatologie/Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Susanne SausseleIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Georg-Nikolaus FrankeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
François-X MahonBergonie Institute Cancer Center Bordeaux, INSERM U1218, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Rodica TalmaciHematology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Carol Davila', Bucharest, Romania.
Dolors ColomerHematopathology Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Simona SoveriniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Institute of Hematology "Lorenzo e Ariosto Seràgnoli", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Katerina Machova PolakovaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nicholas C P CrossWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, UK.
Andreas HochhausAbteilung Hämatologie/Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Thomas ErnstAbteilung Hämatologie/Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. thomas.ernst@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-489X
Klinikum Magdeburg · DEWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory · GBCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROHeidelberg University · DEImperial College London · GBInstitute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion · CZUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Novartis Pharma EUTOS for CML
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApproximately 1-2% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients harbor atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts that cannot be monitored by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using standard methodologies. Within the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML we established and validated robust RT-qPCR methods for these patients.

methodsBCR-ABL1 transcripts were amplified and sequenced to characterize the underlying fusion. Residual disease monitoring was carried out by RT-qPCR with specific primers and probes using serial dilutions of appropriate BCR-ABL1 and GUSB plasmid DNA calibrators. Results were expressed as log reduction of the BCR-ABL1/GUSB ratio relative to the patient-specific baseline value and evaluated as an individual molecular response (IMR).

resultsIn total, 330 blood samples (2-34 per patient, median 8) from 33 CML patients (19 male, median age 62 years) were analyzed. Patients expressed seven different atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts (e1a2, n = 6; e6a2, n = 1; e8a2, n = 2; e13a3, n = 4; e14a3, n = 6; e13a3/e14a3, n = 2; e19a2, n = 12). Most patients (61%) responded well to TKI therapy and achieved an IMR of at least one log reduction 3 months after diagnosis. Four patients relapsed with a significant increase of BCR-ABL1/GUSB ratios.

conclusionsCharacterization of atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts is essential for adequate patient monitoring and to avoid false-negative results. The results cannot be expressed on the International Scale (IS) and thus the common molecular milestones and guidelines for treatment are difficult to apply. We, therefore, suggest reporting IMR levels in these cases as a time-dependent log reduction of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels compared to baseline prior to therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsRNA, MessengerSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorFusion Proteins, bcr-ablProtein Kinase InhibitorsRNA, MessengerAtypical transcriptsBCR-ABL1Chronic myeloid leukemiaCMLMolecular monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33677711
PMCPMC8397658
OpenAlexW3134807583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.