Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677699›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2021

Chronic kidney disease progression in aged patients.

Murat Tuğcu, Dilek Barutçu Ataş

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Murat TuğcuMarmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Fevzi Çakmak District, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Street No:10 Pendik, 34899, Istanbul, Turkey. drmrttgc@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-050X
Dilek Barutçu AtaşMarmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Fevzi Çakmak District, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Street No:10 Pendik, 34899, Istanbul, Turkey.
Marmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major morbidity, and its prevalence increases with age. However, there appears to be some confusion about the prognosis of CKD in aged patients, because, it has its own characteristics different from youngers. In this study, we investigated the progression of CKD and related factors in aged patients.

methodsThis was a retrospective study including 334 patients over 80 years of age that were diagnosed with stage 3-4 CKD at our CKD clinic. CKD progression was assessed as an annual decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Comorbidities were globally categorized with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), but diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiac morbidities were evaluated separately. Patients were grouped as either 'progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD)' or 'others'.

resultsDuring the follow-up period, 191 (57.2%) patients exhibited progression; the annual median eGFR declined by 0.8 ml/min/1.73 m

conclusionIn aged patients, CKD progressed slowly, but particularly high initial creatinine levels and proteinuria could be indicator of progression. In addition, cardiac comorbidities may facilitate progression to ESRD.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsChronic kidney diseaseElderlyFactorsProgression

Identifiers

PMID33677699
OpenAlexW3134374582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.