Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677623›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021

Neural cell-surface and intracellular autoantibodies in patients with cognitive impairment from a memory clinic cohort.

Niels Hansen, Berend Malchow, Inga Zerr, Winfried Stöcker, Jens Wiltfang, Charles Timäus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The role of autoantibodies in Alzheimer's disease: Pathogenetic connections or epiphenomena?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Niels HansenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Göttingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. niels.hansen@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Berend MalchowDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Göttingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Inga ZerrDepartment of Neurology, University of Goettingen, Robert-Koch Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Winfried StöckerEuroimmun Reference Laboratory, Seekamp 31, 23650, Luebeck, Germany.
Jens WiltfangDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Göttingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Charles TimäusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Göttingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEEuroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoantibody-associated cognitive impairment is an expanding field in geriatric psychiatry. We aim to assess the association between the presence of specific neural autoantibodies and cognitive performance in a memory clinic cohort. 154 patients with cognitive impairment were included between 2019 and 2020 presenting initially in a memory clinic. We evaluated their patient files retrospectively applying epidemiologic parameters, psychopathology, neuropsychology, intracellular and membrane-surface autoantibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and markers of neurodegeneration in CSF. In 26 of 154 patients, we searched for neural autoantibodies due to indicators for autoimmunity. In 15/26 (58%) of patients we detected serum and/or CSF autoantibodies. We identified autoantibodies against intracellular or cell-surface antigens in 7 of all 26 (27%) patients with cognitive dysfunction, although we cannot exclude patients with potential specific autoantibodies lacking autoimmune indicators. There were no significant differences between psychopathological and neuropsychological profiles in groups of patients with cognitive impairment comprising patients with autoantibodies (ABS + COG), no autoantibodies (ABS - COG), and Alzheimer's disease (ADCOG). Concerning our CSF parameters, we detected intrathecal IgG synthesis in 14% of ABS + COG and in 13% of ABS - COG patients, whereas no intrathecal IgG synthesis was found in ADCOG patients. Furthermore, CSF Aß42 was significantly diminished in the ADCOG compared to the ABS + COG group (p < 0.05). In addition, the Aß42/40 ratio was lower in ADCOG patients than in the ABS + COG or ABS - COG group (p < 0.05). Our findings reveal the underestimated occurrence and autoantibodies' potential role in patients presenting cognitive impairment. Furthermore, the patients with possible Alzheimer's disease might be differentiated from autoantibody-positive patients via a reduced Aß42 and Aß42/40 ratio in the CSF. The antibody-type varies between patients to a relevant degree, thus demonstrating the need for more research to identify subgroup-specific phenotypes. These pilot study results open an avenue for improving diagnosis and treatment in a memory clinic.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAutoantibodiesHumansPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityCognitive impairmentNeural autoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID33677623
PMCPMC7969694
OpenAlexW3134912342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.