Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677613›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2021

Accuracy of ultrasonography for differentiating between simple and complex appendicitis in children.

David J Nijssen, Paul van Amstel, Joost van Schuppen, Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk, Ramon R Gorter, Roel Bakx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David J NijssenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.nijssen@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8360-8585
Paul van AmstelDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost van SchuppenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens D Eeftinck SchattenkerkDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ramon R GorterDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roel BakxDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate differentiation between simple and complex appendicitis is important since differences in treatment exist. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonography in differentiating between simple and complex appendicitis.

methodsData from children aged < 18 years who underwent appendectomy between the 1st of January 2013 and the 1st of January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Ultrasonography reports of eligible children were divided into simple (test negative) and complex appendicitis (test positive) based on predefined criteria and compared to a gold standard (a combination of predefined perioperative and histopathological criteria). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated to measure ultrasonographic accuracy in differentiating between simple and complex appendicitis.

results176 children were eligible for inclusion. The mean age at the time of operation was 10.1 ± SD 4.6 years. 84 (47.7%) children had simple appendicitis and 92 (52.3%) had complex appendicitis. The use of ultrasonography yielded a sensitivity: 46%, specificity: 90%, PPV: 84%, and NPV: 60%.

conclusionUltrasonography as standalone modality is not suitable for differentiating between simple and complex appendicitis in children. To improve preoperative differentiation, other variables such as clinical signs and laboratory data are necessary in conjunction with ultrasonography findings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAppendectomyAppendicitisChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyAppendectomyAppendicitisComplex appendicitisPediatric surgeryPerforated appendicitisUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33677613
PMCPMC8172400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.