Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33677313›Full record

SynthesisBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Risk of recurrence among patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elizabeth M Salvo, Abril Oliva Ramirez, Jenilee Cueto, Ernest H Law, Aaron Situ, Chris Cameron, Imtiaz A Samjoo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth M SalvoEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Abril Oliva RamirezEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Jenilee CuetoPatient & Health Impact, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Ernest H LawPatient & Health Impact, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron SituEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Chris CameronEVERSANA, Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Imtiaz A SamjooEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: imtiaz.samjoo@eversana.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess breast cancer (BC) outcomes among patients with early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC, receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies were identified using Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Clinical and methodological similarities including alignment of outcome definitions with standardized definitions for efficacy endpoints criteria were assessed to evaluate feasibility of conducting a meta-analysis. Where feasible, 5-year probabilities of BC recurrence or death were estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical arm-based model.

resultsOf 21 included studies, 8 RCTs and 4 RWE studies reported outcome data of interest. There was heterogeneity in outcome reporting, as well as variation in recurrence risk amongst studies with aligned reporting. Of the 12 studies, 10 were considered for inclusion in a meta-analysis of BC recurrence or death. Only a subgroup analysis of node-positive patients (3 studies; n = 7307) was deemed feasible. The 5-year probability of BC recurrence or death was 17.2% (95% credible interval: 14.6%-20.3%).

conclusionAlthough studies reporting recurrence outcomes were limited, there remains a high risk of BC recurrence, especially among node-positive patients. Approximately 1 in 6 women with node-positive HR+/HER2- early-stage BC receiving endocrine therapy experience recurrence or death within 5-years of initiating treatment, suggesting a need for novel treatments for this population.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdjuvant endocrine therapyEarly breast cancerMeta-analysisRecurrence-free survivalRecurrence riskSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID33677313
PMCPMC8089079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.