ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021
Young Adult Populations Face Yet Another Barrier to Care With Insurers: Limited Access to Proton Therapy.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of Crowdfunding Campaigns for Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Proton Therapy Utilization Among Adult Cancer Patients.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Proton Beam Therapy and the AYA Sarcoma Patient Journey: Highlighting Needs from Diagnosis to Survivorship.Cancers · 2025Review
- Independent Review Organization and Proton Therapy: Multistate Analysis and Legal Procedural Strategies.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- The Burden of Insurance Prior Authorization on Cancer Care: A Review of Evidence From Radiation Oncology.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Proton Therapy Mediates Dose Reductions to Brain Structures Associated With Cognition in Children With Medulloblastoma.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Article
- Shifting Strategies in the Treatment of Pediatric Craniopharyngioma.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Review
- Strategic Operational Redesign Improves Prior Authorization Access: A Validation Study.International journal of particle therapy · 2023Article
- Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults with Head and Neck Sarcomas.International journal of particle therapy · 2023Article
- Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Challenges and limitations of clinical trials in the adolescent and young adult CNS cancer population: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeYoung patients, including pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (YA) patients, are most likely to benefit from the reduced integral dose of proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) resulting in fewer late toxicities and secondary malignancies. This study sought to examine insurance approval and appeal outcomes for PBT among YA patients compared with pediatric patients at a large-volume proton therapy center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 284 consecutive patients aged 0 to 39 years for whom PBT was recommended in 2018 through 2019. Pediatric patients were defined as aged 0 to 18 years and YA patients 19 to 39 years. Rates of approval, denials, and decision timelines were calculated. Tumor type and location were also evaluated as factors that may influence insurance decisions.
resultsA total of 207 patients (73%) were approved for PBT at initial request. YA patients (n = 68/143, 48%) were significantly less likely to receive initial approval compared with pediatric patients (n = 139/141; 99%) (P < .001). Even after 47% (n = 35 of 75) of the PBT denials for YA patients were overturned, YAs had a significantly lower final PBT approval (72% vs pediatric 99%; P < .001). The median wait time was also significantly longer for YA patients (median, 8 days; interquartile range [IQR] 3-17 vs median, 2 days; IQR, 0-6; P < .001). In those patients requiring an appeal, the median wait time was 16 days (IQR, 9-25).
conclusionGiven the decades of survivorship of YA patients, PBT is an important tool to reduce late toxicities and secondary malignancies. Compared with pediatric patients, YA patients are significantly less likely to receive insurance approval for PBT. Insurance denials and subsequent appeal requests result in significant delays for YA patients. Insurers need to re-examine their policies to include expedited decisions and appeals and removal of arbitrary age cutoffs so that YA patients can gain easier access to PBT. Furthermore, consensus guidelines encouraging greater PBT access for YA may be warranted from both medical societies and/or AYA experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.