Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33676629›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2021

Diagnosis of non-consensus transient ischaemic attacks with focal, negative, and non-progressive symptoms: population-based validation by investigation and prognosis.

Maria A Tuna, Peter M Rothwell, Oxford Vascular Study

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07421973 (The UTRAVERA), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07421973 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The UTRAVERA: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Investigation on Vertigo and Dizziness Due to Vertebrobasilar Transient Neurological Attacks - Diagnoses, Clinical Features, Treatment Responses, and Prognostic Factors.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsVertigo, Dizziness, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), Transient Neurologic Symptoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [The SCD diagnostic strategy, procedure and pathway for episodic vestibular syndrome].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-regional sequential pain syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke as "surgeons affairs": a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Vascular vertigo and dizziness: Diagnostic criteria.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. SGLT1/2 as the potential biomarkers of renal damage under ApoeFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2021
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria A TunaWolfson Centre for the Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter M RothwellWolfson Centre for the Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: peter.rothwell@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Oxford Vascular Study
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) can be difficult. There is consensus on classic symptoms (eg, motor weakness, dysphasia, hemianopia, monocular visual loss) but no consensus on several monosymptomatic events with sudden-onset, non-progressive, focal negative symptoms (eg, isolated diplopia, dysarthria, vertigo, ataxia, sensory loss, and bilateral visual disturbance), with much variation in investigation and treatment.

methodsWe prospectively ascertained and investigated all strokes and sudden onset transient neurological symptoms in a population of 92 728 people (no age restrictions) from Oxfordshire, UK, who sought medical attention at nine primary care practices or at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK (Oxford Vascular Study). Patients classified at baseline with minor ischaemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Score <5), classic TIA, or non-consensus TIA were treated according to secondary prevention guidelines. Risks of stroke (7-day, 90-day, and 10-year risks) and risks of all major vascular events (from the time of first event, and from the time of seeking medical attention) were established by face-to-face follow-up visits and were compared with the risk expected from age and sex-specific stroke incidence in the underlying study population.

findingsBetween April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2018, 2878 patients were identified with minor ischaemic stroke (n=1287), classic TIA (n=1021), or non-consensus TIA (n=570). Follow-up was to Oct 1, 2018 (median 5·2 [IQR 2·6-9·2] years). 577 first recurrent strokes after the index event occurred during 17 009 person-years of follow-up. 90-day stroke risk from time of the index event after a non-consensus TIA was similar to that after classic TIA (10·6% [95% CI 7·8-12·9] vs 11·6% [95% CI 9·6-13·6]; hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·64-1·19; p=0·43), and higher than after amaurosis fugax (4·3% [95% CI 0·6-8·0]; p=0·042). However, patients with non-consensus TIA were less likely to seek medical attention on the day of the event than were those with classic TIA (336 of 570 [59%] vs 768 of 1021 [75%]; odds ratio [OR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·38-0·59; p<0·0001) and were more likely to have recurrent strokes before seeking attention (45 of 570 [8%] vs 47 of 1021 [5%]; OR 1·77, 95% CI 1·16-2·71; p=0·007). After excluding such recurrent strokes, 7-day stroke risk after seeking attention for non-consensus TIA (2·9% [95% CI 1·5-4·3]) was still considerably higher than the expected background risk (relative risk [RR] 203, 95% CI 113-334), particularly if the patient sought attention on the day of the index event (5·0% [2·1-7·9]; RR 300, 137-569). 10-year risk of all major vascular events was similar for non-consensus and classic TIAs (27·1% [95% CI 22·8-31·4] vs 30·9% [27·2-33·7]; p=0·12). Baseline prevalence of atrial fibrillation, patent foramen ovale, and arterial stenoses were also similar for non-consensus TIA and classic TIA, although stenoses in the posterior circulation were more frequent with non-consensus TIA (OR 2·21, 95% CI 1·59-3·08; p<0·0001).

interpretationPatients with non-consensus TIA are at high early and long-term risk of stroke and have cardiovascular pathological findings on investigation similar to those of classic TIA. Designation of non-consensus TIAs as definite cerebrovascular events will increase overall TIA diagnoses by about 50%.

fundingWellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Wolfson Foundation, Masonic Charitable Foundation, and British Heart Foundation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIschemic Attack, TransientLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33676629
PMCPMC7938377
OpenAlexW3135582804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.