Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33676516›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Context matters when implementing patient centred rehabilitation models for persons with cognitive impairment: a case study.

Katherine S McGilton, Alexia Cumal, Dana Corsi, Shaen Gingrich, Nancy Zheng, Astrid Escrig-Pinol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine S McGiltonKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Bickle Centre, 550 University Avenue, Suite 236B, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada. kathy.mcgilton@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-9738
Alexia CumalKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Bickle Centre, 550 University Avenue, Suite 236B, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.
Dana CorsiNorth East Specialized Geriatric Centre, Health Sciences North, 960 D Notre Dame Avenue, Sudbury, Ontario, P3A 2T4, Canada.
Shaen GingrichNorth East Specialized Geriatric Centre, Health Sciences North, 960 D Notre Dame Avenue, Sudbury, Ontario, P3A 2T4, Canada.
Nancy ZhengLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1P8, Canada.
Astrid Escrig-PinolKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Bickle Centre, 550 University Avenue, Suite 236B, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 410011045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) that require inpatient rehabilitation, and as such patient centred rehabilitation models have been developed. However, implementing evidence-based models without attending to the fit of the model to the new context could lead to an unsuccessful outcome. Researchers collaborated with administrators and staff in one rural site to adapt a patient centred rehabilitation model of care in the Canadian province of Ontario. This paper reports on the contextual factors that influenced the implementation of the model of care.

methodsThe study takes a case study approach. One rural facility was purposefully selected for its interest in offering rehabilitation to persons with CI. Four focus group discussions were conducted to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions on the contextual factors that could affect the implementation of the rehabilitation model of care in the facility. Twenty-seven professionals with various backgrounds were purposively sampled using a maximum diversity sampling strategy. A hybrid inductive-deductive approach was used to analyze the data using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework.

resultsAcross the domains of the CICI framework, three domains (political, epidemiological, and geographical) and seven corresponding sub-domains of the context were found to have a major influence on the implementation process. Key elements within the political domain included effective teamwork, facilitation, adequate resources, effective communication strategies, and a vision for change. Within the epidemiological domain, a key element was knowing how to tailor rehabilitation approaches for persons with CI. Infrastructure, an aspect of the geographical domain, focused on the facility's physical layout that required attention.

conclusionsThe CICI framework was a useful guide to identify key factors within the context that existed and were required to fully support the implementation of the model of care in a new environment. The findings suggest that when implementing a new program of care, strong consideration should be paid to the political, epidemiological, and geographical domains of the context and how they interact and influence one another.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHealth PersonnelAgedFocus GroupsHumansOntarioRehabilitation CentersAgedCognitive dysfunctionDelivery of health careFocus groupsHealth personnelRehabilitation centers

Identifiers

PMID33676516
PMCPMC7937255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.