Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33676494›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2021

Development of a simple method to measure static body weight distribution in neurologically and orthopedically normal mature small breed dogs.

Jessica E Linder, Stephanie Thomovsky, Jessica Bowditch, Mallory Lind, Kristine A Kazmierczak, Gert J Breur, Melissa J Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica E LinderDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA.
Stephanie ThomovskyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA.
Jessica BowditchDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA.
Mallory LindDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA.
Kristine A KazmierczakDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA.
Gert J BreurDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA.
Melissa J LewisDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, IN, 47907, West Lafayette, USA. lewis444@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USFlorida College · US

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Veterinary Scholars Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjective outcome measures capable of tracking different aspects of functional recovery in dogs with acute intervertebral disc herniation are needed to optimize physical rehabilitation protocols. Normal, pre-injury distribution of body weight in this population is unknown. The aims of this study were to quantify static weight distribution (SWD) using digital scales and to establish the feasibility of different scale methods in neurologically normal, mature, chondrodystrophic small breed dogs predisposed to intervertebral disc herniation.

resultsTwenty-five healthy, mature dogs were enrolled with a mean age of 4.6 years (SD 2.7) and a mean total body weight of 11.5 kg (SD 3.6). SWD for the thoracic and pelvic limbs and between individual limbs was acquired in triplicate and expressed as a percentage of total body weight using commercially available digital scales in four combinations: two bathroom, two kitchen (with thoracic and pelvic limbs combined), four bathroom and four kitchen (with limbs measured individually). SWD was also obtained using a pressure sensing walkway for comparison to scale data. Feasibility for each method was determined and coefficients of variation were used to calculate inter-trial variability. Mean SWD values were compared between methods using an ANOVA. The two bathroom scales method had the highest feasibility and lowest inter-trial variability and resulted in mean thoracic and pelvic limb SWD of 63 % (SD 3 %) and 37 % (SD 3 %), respectively. Thoracic limb mean SWD was higher for the PSW compared to any of the scale methods (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsSWD in a population of healthy chondrodystrophic dogs was simple to obtain using inexpensive and readily available digital scales. This study generated SWD data for subsequent comparison to dogs recovering from acute intervertebral disc herniation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBody Weights and MeasuresDogsFemaleForelimbHindlimbMaleWeight-BearingBody weight distributionCanineChondrodystrophicDigital scalesSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33676494
PMCPMC7937222
OpenAlexW3118298708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.