Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33676396›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2021

Bomb blast: imaging findings, treatment and clinical course of extremity traumas.

Mehmet Tahtabasi, Sadettin Er, Recep Karasu, Erhan Renan Ucaroglu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pattern of blast injuries. A Systematic Review: Part 1-Improvised, multiple and unspecified explosive devices.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehmet TahtabasiDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia. mehmet.tahtabasi@sbu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-8062
Sadettin ErDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences-Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0003-0712-3153
Recep KarasuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Health Sciences-Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-5794
Erhan Renan UcarogluDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences-Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0003-3655-1595
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRRecep Tayyip Erdoğan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo describe the severity and types of blast-related extremity injuries and the presence of accompanying vascular injuries (VI) and amputation, and to identify the associated factors affecting the treatment management and clinical course.

methodsThe study included 101 patients with extremity injuries caused by a bomb explosion. The radiographs and computed tomography angiographies of the patients were evaluated in terms of injury patterns, presence of penetrating fragments and fractures, and localization (upper or lower extremity) and type (open or closed) of injury. The Gustilo-Anderson classification was used for open fractures. According to their severity, open fractures classified as types 1 and 2 were included in Group 1 and those classified as type 3A, 3B and 3C in Group 2.

resultsAs a result of blast exposure, 101 (57.7%) patients had extremity injuries, of which 76 (75.2%) presented with at least one fracture. Of the total of 103 fractures, nine (8.8%) were closed and 94 (91.2%) were open. Thirty-eight (40.4%) of the open fractures were located in the upper extremities, and 56 (59.6%) in the lower extremities and pelvis. Open fractures were most frequently localized in the femur (n = 20; 21.2%), followed by the tibia (n = 18; 19.1%). The majority of patients with open fractures were in Group 1 (71.4%). The duration of hospital stay was longer in Group 2 (12.1 ± 5.8 vs. 6.3 ± 6.7 days, p <  0.0001, respectively). Mortality among patients in Group 2 (45.0%) was significantly higher than in Group 1 (8.0%) (p <  0.0001). Similarly, the injury severity score (ISS) was higher in Group 2 (median 20 vs. 9, p <  0.0001). VI was present in 13 (12.9%) of all patients, and amputation in seven (7.9%).

conclusionThe presence of severe open fractures, VI, and high ISS score can be considered as important factors that increase morbidity and mortality. In extremity traumas, through the secondary blast mechanism, contaminated-fragmented tissue injuries occur. Therefore, we believe that it will be beneficial to apply damage control surgery in places with low socioeconomic level and poor hygienic conditions.

Indexed as

Blast InjuriesBombsFractures, OpenExplosionsExtremitiesHumansInjury Severity ScoreRetrospective StudiesBlast injuryDamage control surgery (DCS)Gustilo-AndersonImprovised explosive device (IED)Terror-related trauma

Identifiers

PMID33676396
PMCPMC7937268
OpenAlexW3114487604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.