Trial reportESMO open2021
Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision Oncology Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Phase II Clinical Trials with Biomarker-Driven, Adaptive Design.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Pooled it
- Predictive criteria for overall survival and treatment duration of 2nd-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AIO-PAK-0216).British journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- The PRL3-zumab paradigm: A multicenter, single-dose-level phase 2 basket clinical trial design of an unconventional cancer immunotherapy.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Extrapolation of Time-to-Event Survival Outcomes of Histology-Independent Therapies Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- Time-to-progression ratio as a potential study endpoint in early-phase oncology trials: pooled analysis of phase II trials from the Australian MoST program.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- The role of the molecular tumor board: learnings from the ROME trial.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy assessment in phase I clinical trials: endpoints and challenges.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025Review
- Current management of neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive sarcoma: an updated review.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Comparative effectiveness of larotrectinib and entrectinib for TRK fusion cancer.The American journal of managed care · 2022Review
- NTRK Fusion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Therapy, and TRK Inhibitor Resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Letter re: 'Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications'.ESMO open · 2021Article
- Response to comment on "Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications".ESMO open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEntrectinib is a tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive solid tumours based on single-arm trials. Traditional randomised clinical trials in rare cancers are not feasible; we conducted an intrapatient analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of entrectinib versus prior standard-of-care systemic therapies.
methodsPatients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive tumours enrolled in the global phase II, single-arm STARTRK-2 trial were grouped according to prior systemic therapy and response. The key analysis used growth modulation index [GMI; ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on entrectinib to time to discontinuation (TTD) on the most recent prior therapy]; ratio ≥1.3 indicated clinically meaningful efficacy. Additional analyses investigated TTD and objective response rate (ORR) for entrectinib and prior therapies.
resultsSeventy-one patients were included; 51 received prior systemic therapy. In 38 patients who progressed on prior therapy, ORR was 60.5% (23/38) with entrectinib and 15.8% (6/38) with the most recent prior therapy. Median PFS [11.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7-not estimable] for entrectinib exceeded median TTD (2.9 months; 95% CI 2.0-4.9) for most recent prior therapy. From the intrapatient analysis of GMI, 65.8% had a ratio ≥1.3 and median GMI was 2.53. Consistent results were observed at more stringent GMI thresholds; 60.5% of patients had GMI ≥1.5 or ≥1.8 and 57.9% had GMI ≥2.0.
conclusionsORR was high and PFS was longer on entrectinib versus TTD on prior therapy. Furthermore, 65.8% of patients experienced clinically meaningful benefit based on GMI. This intrapatient analysis demonstrates comparative effectiveness of entrectinib in a rare, heterogeneous adult population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.