Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675948›Full record

ArticleAnnals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft2021

Implementation of a fully digital histology course in the anatomical teaching curriculum during COVID-19 pandemic.

D Darici, C Reissner, J Brockhaus, M Missler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D DariciInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, Westfälische-Wilhelms-University, Vesaliusweg 2-4, 48149 Münster, Germany. Electronic address: darici@uni-muenster.de.
C ReissnerInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, Westfälische-Wilhelms-University, Vesaliusweg 2-4, 48149 Münster, Germany.
J BrockhausInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, Westfälische-Wilhelms-University, Vesaliusweg 2-4, 48149 Münster, Germany.
M MisslerInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, Westfälische-Wilhelms-University, Vesaliusweg 2-4, 48149 Münster, Germany. Electronic address: markus.missler@uni-muenster.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many medical schools are forced to switch courses of the mandatory curriculum to online teaching formats. However, little information about feasibility and effectiveness is available yet about distance teaching in anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a histology course previously taught in a classroom setting into an online-only format based on video conference software.

methodsOur course design included theoretical introductions, an online-adaptation of virtual microscopy used previously in the classroom, and active learning elements such as collaborative learning in breakout rooms, annotation assignments and multiple-choice questions. Two preclinical semester cohorts of around 400 second and third semester students were taught in histology in parallel courses, using the Zoom software platform. We analyzed data about student attendance during the course, summative quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the students and results of a written test required to pass the course.

resultsWe observed that student attendance was high and stable during the 19 course days for both second and third semester, and only few students reported technical problems. There were no significant differences in examination results of second semester compared to the third semester, an unexpected result as the third semester already participated in the dissection course before. Similarly, no significant gender-related effects on the examination performance could be noted in both semesters. However, the age of students was negatively correlated with test scores in the second and third semester. Importantly, the overall evaluation of the digital version of the histology course was at least as positive as the in-person version over the past years.

conclusionTogether, we experienced that the implementation of a curricular histology course in an online-format is technically realizable, effective and well accepted among students. We also observed that availability and prior experience with digitized specimen in virtual microscopy facilitates transition into an online-only setting. Thus, our study supports the positive potential of distance learning for teaching anatomy during and after COVID-19 pandemic but also emphasizes the need for a synchronous learning environment with partially personnel-intensive small group settings to overcome passivity and inequality aspects, and to foster active learning elements.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, DistanceAnatomyCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSoftwareVideoconferencingAnatomy teachingCOVID-19Digital histology courseHistology teachingMedical educationOnline histology course

Identifiers

PMID33675948
PMCPMC8739541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.