Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675753›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021

Ocular Injury Associated With Prone Positioning in Adult Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Timothy J Patterson, Peter Currie, Michael Williams, Claire Shevlin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy J PattersonFrom the Department of Acute Critical Care Services, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, Craigavon, United Kingdom. Electronic address: tpatterson02@qub.ac.uk.
Peter CurrieFrom the Department of Acute Critical Care Services, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, Craigavon, United Kingdom.
Michael WilliamsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Claire ShevlinFrom the Department of Acute Critical Care Services, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, Craigavon, United Kingdom.
Craigavon Area Hospital · GBRoyal Victoria Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProne positioning during the COVID-19 pandemic has become increasingly used as an adjunct to increase oxygenation in critical care patients. It is associated with an adverse event profile. This study sought to investigate the occurrence of ocular injuries reported in prone versus supine groups in adult critical care.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library were searched. The search period was January 1, 1990, to July 1, 2020.

resultsEleven randomized controlled trials were included, with 2,247 patients. Twenty-eight events were recorded in 3 trials (174 patients) and no events in the other 8 trials (2,073 patients). The rates of eye injury were 5 events in 1,158 patients (1.30%) and 13 events in 1,089 patients (1.19%) in the prone and supine groups, respectively, which were reduced to 2 of 1,158 patients (0.17%) and 2 of 1,089 patients (0.18%), respectively, when reports of eye or eyelid edema were removed. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences between groups with (an OR of 1.40 (95% CI: 0.37-5.27) and without (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.11-5.73) reported edema.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the rate of reported ocular injury between prone and supine critical care groups. These rates remain higher than the incidence reported during general anesthesia. There is a need for studies in critical care settings in which ocular injury is an end-point and which include extended patient follow-up.

Indexed as

PandemicsProne PositionCOVID-19Critical CareEye InjuriesHumansIncidenceRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID33675753
PMCPMC9745902
OpenAlexW3134644617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.