ArticleThe Gerontologist2022
Moving Toward the Promise of Participatory Engagement of Older Adults in Gerotechnology.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time location system implementation in dementia care: Stakeholder perspectives.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Convergence of neurodegeneration and the arts: a conversation between researchers about stigma, co-creativity, and transformation.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- "That's me at my best": perspectives of older adults on involvement in technology research.Medical humanities · 2025Article
- Designing aesthetically authentic, restorative, and socially interactive environments for retirement homes: impacts on senior consumers' relocation intention.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study on Prerequisites for Responsible Innovation.JMIR nursing · 2024Article
- Conversation for change: engaging older adults as partners in research on gerotechnology.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Using Voice-Activated Technologies to Enhance Well-Being of Older Adults in Long-Term Care Homes.Innovation in aging · 2024Article
- Use and benefit of information, communication, and assistive technology among community-dwelling older adults - a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Toward Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review on Practical Approaches.The Gerontologist · 2023Article
- Supporting Healthy Aging through the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Assistive Technology Implementation: A Rapid Realist Review of Participatory Co-Design for Assistive Technology with Older Adults.Gerontology & geriatric medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited uptake and use of developed technologies by older adults have prompted interest in participatory design and related approaches in the gerotechnology field. Despite this, recent systematic reviews suggest that researchers continue to passively engage older adults in research projects, often only providing advice or feedback in the early or later phases of research. A key barrier to more meaningful and active engagement of older adults is a lack of understanding as to how participatory design differs from other participatory approaches, and in particular, participatory action research. We address this gap in understanding by exploring the theoretical similarities and differences of participatory design and participatory action research, including their scope, goals, and the nature of the involvement of older adults in each. We conclude with key barriers that are critical to address in order to achieve greater involvement of older adults in gerotechnology and to broaden and enrich the goals of this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.