Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675539›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021

Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Kwang S Kim, Ludo Max

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sensorimotor Adaptation to a Nonuniform Formant Perturbation Is Preserved in Healthy Aging.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurophysiological Evidence of Sensory Prediction Errors Driving Speech Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Divided Attention Has Limited Effects on Speech Sensorimotor Control.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Sensory Feedback in Developmental Stuttering: A Review.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kwang S KimUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3600-7090
Ludo MaxUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3967-5545
Haskins Laboratories · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Dynamic bidirectional sensorimotor interactions in stutteringR01DC017444 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAX, LUDO · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
Adaptive sensorimotor learning in speech productionR01DC014510 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAX, LUDO · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
CIHR MOP-137001NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014510NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying stuttering remain poorly understood. A large body of work has focused on sensorimotor integration difficulties in individuals who stutter, including recently the capacity for sensorimotor learning. Typically, sensorimotor learning is assessed with adaptation paradigms in which one or more sensory feedback modalities are experimentally perturbed in real time. Our own previous work on speech with perturbed auditory feedback revealed substantial auditory-motor learning limitations in both children and adults who stutter (AWS). It remains unknown, however, which subprocesses of sensorimotor learning are impaired. Indeed, new insights from research on upper limb motor control indicate that sensorimotor learning involves at least two distinct components: (a) an explicit component that includes intentional strategy use and presumably is driven by target error and (b) an implicit component that updates an internal model without awareness of the learner and presumably is driven by sensory prediction error. Here, we attempted to dissociate these components for speech auditory-motor learning in AWS versus adults who do not stutter (AWNS). Our formant-shift auditory-motor adaptation results replicated previous findings that such sensorimotor learning is limited in AWS. Novel findings are that neither control nor stuttering participants reported any awareness of changing their productions in response to the auditory perturbation and that neither group showed systematic drift in auditory target judgments made throughout the adaptation task. These results indicate that speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback relies exclusively on implicit learning processes. Thus, limited adaptation in AWS reflects poor implicit sensorimotor learning. Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Indexed as

SpeechStutteringAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultChildFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansLearningadaptationauditory feedbackimplicit learningsensorimotor learningstuttering

Identifiers

PMID33675539
PMCPMC8259784
OpenAlexW3135233570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.