Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675528›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2021

Nonclinical Features in Predictive Modeling of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Machine Learning Approach.

Mirza Rizwan Sajid, Noryanti Muhammad, Roslinazairimah Zakaria, Ahmad Shahbaz, Syed Ahmad Chan Bukhari, Seifedine Kadry, A Suresh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Approach to Diagnose COVID-19 Using Machine Learning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mirza Rizwan SajidCentre for Mathematical Sciences, College of Computing and Applied Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia.
Noryanti MuhammadCentre for Mathematical Sciences, College of Computing and Applied Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia. noryanti@ump.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-3720
Roslinazairimah ZakariaCentre for Mathematical Sciences, College of Computing and Applied Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia.
Ahmad ShahbazPunjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Syed Ahmad Chan BukhariDivision of Computer Science, Mathematics and Science, Collins College of Professional Studies, St. Johns University, New York, NY, 11439, USA.
Seifedine KadryFaculty of Applied Computing and Technology, Noroff University College, Kristiansand, Norway.
A SureshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Institute of Science & Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu (D.t), 603 203, Tamilnadu, India.
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah · MYPunjab Institute of Cardiology · PKSRM Institute of Science and Technology · INSt. John's University · US

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia (FRGS Grant RDU 1901190) (FRGS/1/2019/STG06/UMP/02/11)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the broader healthcare domain, the prediction bears more value than an explanation considering the cost of delays in its services. There are various risk prediction models for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in the literature for early risk assessment. However, the substantial increase in CVDs-related mortality is challenging global health systems, especially in developing countries. This situation allows researchers to improve CVDs prediction models using new features and risk computing methods. This study aims to assess nonclinical features that can be easily available in any healthcare systems, in predicting CVDs using advanced and flexible machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsA gender-matched case-control study was conducted in the largest public sector cardiac hospital of Pakistan, and the data of 460 subjects were collected. The dataset comprised of eight nonclinical features. Four supervised ML algorithms were used to train and test the models to predict the CVDs status by considering traditional logistic regression (LR) as the baseline model. The models were validated through the train-test split (70:30) and tenfold cross-validation approaches.

resultsRandom forest (RF), a nonlinear ML algorithm, performed better than other ML algorithms and LR. The area under the curve (AUC) of RF was 0.851 and 0.853 in the train-test split and tenfold cross-validation approach, respectively. The nonclinical features yielded an admissible accuracy (minimum 71%) through the LR and ML models, exhibiting its predictive capability in risk estimation.

conclusionThe satisfactory performance of nonclinical features reveals that these features and flexible computational methodologies can reinforce the existing risk prediction models for better healthcare services.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCase-Control StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningCardiovascular diseasesCost-effective modelMachine learning algorithmsNonclinical featuresRisk prediction models

Identifiers

PMID33675528
OpenAlexW3134074913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.