Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675521›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2021

Twelve years of circulatory extracorporeal life support at the University Medical Centre Utrecht.

C L Meuwese, J A Hermens, M de Haan, S A Braithwaite, F Ramjankhan, M P Buijsrogge, N de Jonge, J H Kirkels, M de Jong, W Pasma and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06522594 (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform in ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - Beta Receptor Modulation Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06522594 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform in ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - Beta Receptor Modulation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsHeart Failure, Cardiogenic ShockArmsEsmolol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. ECPELLA as a bridge-to-decision in refractory cardiogenic shock: a single-centre experience.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  6. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

C L MeuweseDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.l.meuwese@umcutrecht.nl.
J A HermensDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M de HaanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S A BraithwaiteDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F RamjankhanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M P BuijsroggeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N de JongeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J H KirkelsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M de JongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W PasmaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J L P Vromen-WijsmanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A O KraaijeveldDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E E de WaalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E TornDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M PlatenkampDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J J van der HeijdenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
O L CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
D van DijkDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
D W DonkerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCirculatory extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has been performed at the University Medical Centre Utrecht for 12 years. During this time, case mix, indications, ECLS set-ups and outcomes seem to have substantially changed. We set out to describe these characteristics and their evolution over time.

methodsAll patients receiving circulatory ECLS between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively identified and divided into six groups according to a 2-year period of time corresponding to the date of ECLS initiation. General characteristics plus data pertaining to comorbidities, indications and technical details of ECLS commencement as well as in-hospital, 30-day, 1‑year and overall mortality were collected. Temporal trends in these characteristics were examined.

resultsA total of 347 circulatory ECLS runs were performed in 289 patients. The number of patients and ECLS runs increased from 8 till a maximum of 40 runs a year. The distribution of circulatory ECLS indications shifted from predominantly postcardiotomy to a wider set of indications. The proportion of peripheral insertions with or without application of left ventricular unloading techniques substantially increased, while in-hospital, 30-day, 1‑year and overall mortality decreased over time.

conclusionCirculatory ECLS was increasingly applied at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Over time, indications as well as treatment goals broadened, and cannulation techniques shifted from central to mainly peripheral approaches. Meanwhile, weaning success increased and mortality rates diminished.

Indexed as

Cardiogenic shockECLSExtracorporeal life supportMortality

Identifiers

PMID33675521
PMCPMC8271054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.