Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675509›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

State of the art in robotic rectal surgery: marginal gains worth the pain?

Irfan Nasir, Amro Mureb, Chukwuebuka C Aliozo, Mohamed H Abunada, Amjad Parvaiz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Irfan NasirNHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-4997
Amro MurebNHS Foundation Trust, Poole Hospital, Long Fleet Road, Poole, BH15 2JB, Dorset, UK.
Chukwuebuka C AliozoNHS Foundation Trust, Poole Hospital, Long Fleet Road, Poole, BH15 2JB, Dorset, UK.
Mohamed H AbunadaHamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Amjad ParvaizNHS Foundation Trust, Poole Hospital, Long Fleet Road, Poole, BH15 2JB, Dorset, UK. apcheema@yahoo.com.
Poole Hospital · GBHamad General Hospital · QANorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After their first introduction in the 1990s to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery, especially in confined spaces such as the pelvis, telemanipulators (i.e., master-slave manipulators) have gained popularity and acceptance among gastrointestinal surgeons. These complex, interventional surgical devices use multiple technologies, such as 3-D advanced imaging, tremor reduction and 7-degree movement. Superior instrument dexterity, stable precise vision and accessibility to narrow confined spaces make these devices well suited for colorectal surgery. The drive for innovations in the field of surgical robotics will leverage novel robots driven by data, image integration, and artificial intelligence. However, if this vision is to be realized, lessons must be learned from the current literature and clinical trials. The feasibility and safety of robotic rectal surgery is now well established; increasing evidence suggests that when compared to laparoscopic rectal surgery, robotic approaches might offer superior peri-operative outcomes. Notably, the marginal gains achieved with the use of robotics in rectal cancer surgery are linked with structured training and standardization of operative techniques. With decreasing costs and wider availability of new systems, it is foreseeable that robotic surgical systems will be an integral part of colorectal practice.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresArtificial IntelligenceHumansRectumColorectal surgeryRectal surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID33675509
OpenAlexW3134846264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.