Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675460›Full record

Trial reportBrain imaging and behavior2021

Nicotine gum enhances visual processing in healthy nonsmokers.

Thiago P Fernandes, Natalia L Almeida, Gabriella M Silva, Natanael A Santos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thiago P FernandesFederal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Brazil. thiagompfernandes@gmail.com.
Natalia L AlmeidaFederal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Brazil. natalialalmeida@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-7644
Gabriella M SilvaFederal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Brazil.
Natanael A SantosFederal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305258/2019-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe main purpose of this study was to investigate the isolated effects of nicotine on visual processing, namely contrast processing.

methodsThirteen participants, aged 18-40 years, were enrolled in this double blind, randomized and pilot controlled trial involving nicotine gum administration (placebo, 2-mg and 4-mg doses). The participants' instruction was to detect the location of vertical gratings (0.2; 1.0; 3.3; 5.7; 8.8; 13.2 and 15.9 cycles per degree) when it was presented either left or right on the monitor screen. A repeated multivariate analysis of variance was conducted to analyse the results for the visual processing tasks. Bayesian analyses were also carried out considering maximum robustness to avoid bias.

resultsThe findings that nicotine gum administration resulted in better contrast discrimination when compared to placebo gum (p < .001). More specifically, the 4-mg resulted in better visual sensitivity when compared to the 2-mg (p < .01) and the placebo (p < .001) gum. Demographic data were not related to the outcomes.

conclusionsThese data bring the need for support the findings. If proved, it is possible that nicotine, in small doses, can have a potential therapeutic use for those populations with low vision. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-46tjy3.

Indexed as

NicotineSmoking CessationBayes TheoremDouble-Blind MethodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNon-SmokersVisual PerceptionNicotineAddiction researchContrast sensitivityNicotinePhysiologyVisual processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.