Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675433›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2021

Current updates in machine learning in the prediction of therapeutic outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma: what should we know?

Zhi-Min Zou, De-Hua Chang, Hui Liu, Yu-Dong Xiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhi-Min ZouDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No.139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, China.
De-Hua ChangDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hui LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No.139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, China.
Yu-Dong XiaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No.139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, China. xiaoyudong222@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-3447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of machine learning (ML) algorithms, a growing number of predictive models have been established for predicting the therapeutic outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after various treatment modalities. By using the different combinations of clinical and radiological variables, ML algorithms can simulate human learning to detect hidden patterns within the data and play a critical role in artificial intelligence techniques. Compared to traditional statistical methods, ML methods have greater predictive effects. ML algorithms are widely applied in nearly all steps of model establishment, such as imaging feature extraction, predictive factor classification, and model development. Therefore, this review presents the literature pertaining to ML algorithms and aims to summarize the strengths and limitations of ML, as well as its potential value in prognostic prediction, after various treatment modalities for HCC.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaMachine learningModalityPredictive

Identifiers

PMID33675433
PMCPMC7936998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.