Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675390›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Management, outcome, and novel classification system of periprosthetic fractures in patients with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS)-a retrospective cohort analysis.

Marcus Örgel, Maximilian Petri, Alexander Ranker, Nils Wirries, Tilman Graulich, Christian Krettek, Marcel Winkelmann, Horst-Heinrich Aschoff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ReliableFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus ÖrgelTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Oergel.Marcus@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-2864
Maximilian PetriOrthopaedic Department, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Straße 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Alexander RankerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Nils WirriesOrthopaedic Department, Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Straße 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Tilman GraulichTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Christian KrettekTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Marcel WinkelmannTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Horst-Heinrich AschoffTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEDiakovere · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTranscutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) are anchored prosthetic systems for major limb loss. Sometimes TOPS patients suffer from periprosthetic fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the management and outcomes of periprosthetic fractures in patients with TOPS and to introduce a novel classification system for this entity. MATERIAL/

methodsSince 2010, 140 patients were treated with TOPS after transfemoral amputation in two centers in Germany. Fifteen patients sustained periprosthetic fractures, with five intra- and ten postoperative fractures. The outcome was analyzed by Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ), K-level and prosthesis wear time per day. A subgroup analysis for the body mass index (BMI) was performed.

resultsAll postoperative fractures were treated with implant-retaining osteosynthesis. Fourteen fractures healed without complications after a mean of 3 months. One postoperative fracture developed a clinically asymptomatic firm non-union. No Endo-Fixstem had to be removed. For the fracture and control group, a significant increase of the PMQ (p < 0.001) and K-level (p < 0.001) was observed after TOPS treatment compared to the preoperative baseline. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed a significant increase of the PMQ and K-level for both normal weight (p = 0.002) and overweight patients (p < 0.001). Of interest, overweight patients even showed a significantly higher increase in scores compared to normal weight patients, regardless of periprosthetic fracture.

conclusionPeriprosthetic fractures do not necessarily worsen outcomes of TOPS treatment. Proper classification and standardized appropriate treatment strategies according to fracture morphology are paramount for reliably good outcomes. We recommend to not remove or exchange the implant (Endo-Fixstem) even if it is assembly. Higher BMI did not have an impact onto rehabilitation success after TOPS to major limb loss of the lower extremity.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesPeriprosthetic FracturesCohort StudiesCyclic N-OxidesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansOverweightRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCyclic N-OxidesTOPSAmputationBone anchored prosthetic systemsEndo-exo-prosthesisPeriprosthetic fracturesRehabilitationTranscutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic system (TOPS)

Identifiers

PMID33675390
PMCPMC9217873
OpenAlexW3135733596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.