Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675235›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical virology2021

The role of teicoplanin in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective study in critically ill COVID-19 patients (Tei-COVID study).

Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Francesco Alessandri, Alessandra Oliva, Cristian Borrazzo, Serena Dell'Isola, Anna Maria Ialungo, Elena Rastrelli, Massimiliano Pelli, Giammarco Raponi, Ombretta Turriziani and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Can treatment with teicoplanin improve the prognosis of COVID-19 patients?International journal of clinical practice · 2021
    Trial
  3. Severe COVID-19: Drugs and Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Teicoplanin derivatives block spike protein mediated viral entry as pan-SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Coronavirus Entry Inhibitors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Teicoplanin-A New Use for an Old Drug in the COVID-19 Era?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Giancarlo CeccarelliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5921-3180
Francesco AlessandriCovid Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra OlivaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Cristian BorrazzoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Serena Dell'IsolaProtect Medicine Division, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.
Anna Maria IalungoProtect Medicine Division, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.
Elena RastrelliProtect Medicine Division, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.
Massimiliano PelliIntensive Care Unit, Department of medical and Surgical Science and Traslational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-6484
Giammarco RaponiMicrobiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ombretta TurrizianiVirology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-9168
Franco RubertoCovid Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Monica RoccoIntensive Care Unit, Department of medical and Surgical Science and Traslational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PuglieseCovid Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro RussoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriella d'EttorreDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mario VendittiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Policlinico Umberto I · ITOspedale di Belcolle · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITDepartment of Public Health · MMUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teicoplanin has a potential antiviral activity expressed against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and was suggested as a complementary option to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In this multicentric, retrospective, observational research the aim was to evaluate the impact of teicoplanin on the course of COVID-19 in critically ill patients. Fifty-five patients with severe COVID-19, hospitalized in the intensive care units (ICUs) and treated with best available therapy were retrospectively analysed. Among them 34 patients were also treated with teicoplanin (Tei-COVID group), while 21 without teicoplanin (control group). Crude in-hospital Day-30 mortality was lower in Tei-COVID group (35.2%) than in control group (42.8%), however not reaching statistical significance (p = .654). No statistically significant differences in length of stay in the ICU were observed between Tei-COVID group and control group (p = .248). On Day 14 from the ICU hospitalization, viral clearance was achieved in 64.7% patients of Tei-COVID group and 57.1% of control group, without statistical difference. Serum C-reactive protein level was significantly reduced in Tei-COVID group compared to control group, but not other biochemical parameters. Finally, Gram-positive were the causative pathogens for 25% of BSIs in Tei-COVID group and for 70.6% in controls. No side effects related to teicoplanin use were observed. Despite several limitations require further research, in this study the use of teicoplanin is not associated with a significant improvement in outcomes analysed. The antiviral activity of teicoplanin against SARS-CoV-2, previously documented, is probably more effective at early clinical stages.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHospital MortalityAgedAntiviral AgentsC-Reactive ProteinCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2TeicoplaninAntiviral AgentsC-Reactive ProteinTeicoplaninCOVID-19glycopeptideICUintensive care unitpneumoniaSARS-CoV-2Teicoplanin

Identifiers

PMID33675235
PMCPMC8250836
OpenAlexW3134562938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.