ArticlePharmaceutical statistics2021
Matrix decomposition in meta-analysis for extraction of adverse event pattern and patient-level safety profile.
Article in Pharmaceutical statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Matrix decomposition in meta-analysis for extraction of adverse event pattern and patient-level safety profile.Pharmaceutical statistics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of assessing adverse events (AEs) in clinical studies is to evaluate what AE patterns are likely to occur during treatment. In contrast, it is difficult to specify which of these patterns occurs in each patient. To tackle this challenging issue, we constructed a new statistical model including nonnegative matrix factorization by incorporating background knowledge of AE-specific structures such as severity and drug mechanism of action. The model uses a meta-analysis framework for integrating data from multiple clinical studies because insufficient information is derived from a single trial. We demonstrated the proposed method by applying it to real data consisting of three Phase III studies, two mechanisms of action, five anticancer treatments, 3317 patients, 848 AE types, and 99,546 AEs. The extracted typical treatment-specific AE patterns coincided with medical knowledge. We also demonstrated patient-level safety profiles using the data of AEs that were observed by the end of the second cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.