Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33675009›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Incomplete neo-endothelialization of left atrial appendage closure devices is frequent after 6 months: a pilot imaging study.

Simon Lindner, Michael Behnes, Annika Wenke, Benjamin Sartorius, Muharrem Akin, Kambis Mashayekhi, Joshua Gawlitza, Kathrin Julia Weidner, Uzair Ansari, Holger Haubenreisser and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiac CT for electrophysiological interventions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Simon LindnerFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Michael BehnesFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. michael.behnes@umm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5970-0093
Annika WenkeFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Benjamin SartoriusFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Muharrem AkinDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Kambis MashayekhiClinic for Cardiology and Angiology II, Universitaetszentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University of Freiburg, Südring 15, 79189, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Joshua GawlitzaInstitute of Clinical Radiology, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Kathrin Julia WeidnerFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Uzair AnsariFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Holger HaubenreisserInstitute of Clinical Radiology, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan O SchoenbergInstitute of Clinical Radiology, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Martin BorggrefeFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Ibrahim AkinFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo bridge neo-endothelialization (NE) of implanted left atrial appendage closure (LAA/LAAC) devices, dual antiplatelet therapy is prescribed. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (cCTA) has been proposed for the evaluation of interventional LAAC. This prospective longitudinal observational study applied a standardized imaging protocol to detect progression of NE of LAAC devices 6 months after implantation.

methodsConsecutive cCTA datasets of patients six months after LAAC were acquired and the standardized multi-planar reconstruction LAA occluder view for post-implantation evaluation (LOVE) algorithm was used. Residual flow of contrast agent inside the LAA without a peri-device leak (PDL) was defined as incomplete neo-endothelialization. Absence of residual flow was defined as complete neo-endothelialization. Since PDL allows residual flow in the LAA, irrespective of neoendothelialization, PDL were excluded from this study. Diabetes mellitus, liver disease, body-mass-index, age, device sizes and type will be assessed as predictors for incomplete NE.

results53 consecutive patients were recruited for cCTA imaging. 36 (68%) showed no PDL and were included in the study (median age 77 years, 19% female). At median follow-up of 6 months (median 180 days, IQR 178-180), 44% of patients showed complete NE compared to 56% with NE still incomplete. Age, BMI, device type and size as well as prevalence of diabetes mellitus and liver disease did not show significant correlation with the completeness of NE.

conclusionThis pilot study showed that neo-endothelialization is still incomplete in a majority of patients at mid-term follow-up of 6 months after successful LAAC therapy. Further investigation on the consequences of incomplete endothelialization is needed to guide antiplatelet therapy schedules.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationSeptal Occluder DeviceCardiac CatheterizationEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationCardiac computed tomography angiographyInterventional therapyNeoendothelialization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.