Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33674854›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange.

Nate C Apathy, Joshua R Vest, Julia Adler-Milstein, Justin Blackburn, Brian E Dixon, Christopher A Harle

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Health interoperability across phenotypes of family physician practices.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of electronic health record developers in hospital patient sharing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nate C ApathyDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-8544
Joshua R VestRegenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7226-9688
Julia Adler-MilsteinDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Justin BlackburnHealth Policy & Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Brian E DixonRegenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-0607
Christopher A HarleRegenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

The Indiana Training Program in Public & Population Health InformaticsT15LM012502 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Brian E. Dixon, William F Fadel · 2017 to 2026
$4.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM012502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the practice- and market-level factors associated with the amount of provider health information exchange (HIE) use. MATERIALS AND

methodsProvider and practice-level data was drawn from the Meaningful Use Stage 2 Public Use Files from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Physician Compare National Downloadable File, and the Compendium of US Health Systems, among other sources. We analyzed the relationship between provider HIE use and practice and market factors using multivariable linear regression and compared primary care providers (PCPs) to non-PCPs. Provider volume of HIE use is measured as the percentage of referrals sent with electronic summaries of care (eSCR) reported by eligible providers attesting to the Meaningful Use electronic health record (EHR) incentive program in 2016.

resultsProviders used HIE in 49% of referrals; PCPs used HIE in fewer referrals (43%) than non-PCPs (57%). Provider use of products from EHR vendors was negatively related to HIE use, while use of Athenahealth and Greenway Health products were positively related to HIE use. Providers treating, on average, older patients and greater proportions of patients with diabetes used HIE for more referrals. Health system membership, market concentration, and state HIE consent policy were unrelated to provider HIE use. DISCUSSION: HIE use during referrals is low among office-based providers with the capability for exchange, especially PCPs. Practice-level factors were more commonly associated with greater levels of HIE use than market-level factors.

conclusionThis furthers the understanding that market forces, like competition, may be related to HIE adoption decisions but are less important for use once adoption has occurred.

Indexed as

Health Information ExchangeAgedCommerceElectronic Health RecordsHumansMeaningful UseMedicareUnited Stateselectronic health recordshealth information exchangehealth information interoperabilityhealth information technologymeaningful usemedical informaticsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33674854
PMCPMC8279783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.