Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33674437›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Long-Term Exposure to Octenidine in a Simulated Sink Trap Environment Results in Selection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,

Isobel Garratt, Paz Aranega-Bou, J Mark Sutton, Ginny Moore, Matthew E Wand

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of Efflux Pumps on Antimicrobial Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Antibiofilm Properties of Antiseptic Agents Used onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What Makes Pseudomonas aeruginosa a Pathogen?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isobel GarrattTechnology Development Group, Public Health England, National Infection Service, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Paz Aranega-BouBiosafety, Air and Water Microbiology Group, Public Health England, National Infection Service, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
J Mark SuttonTechnology Development Group, Public Health England, National Infection Service, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Ginny MooreBiosafety, Air and Water Microbiology Group, Public Health England, National Infection Service, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Matthew E WandTechnology Development Group, Public Health England, National Infection Service, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom matthew.wand@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9277-8869
Public Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Octenidine-based disinfection products are becoming increasingly popular for infection control of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative isolates. When a waste trap was removed from a hospital and allowed to acclimatize in a standard tap rig in our laboratory, it was shown that

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacterial ProteinsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeHospitalsIminesMembrane Transport ProteinsMutationPseudomonas aeruginosaPyridinesWaste Disposal, FluidAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial ProteinsIminesMembrane Transport ProteinsoctenidinePyridinesCitrobacterEnterobacteroctenidinePseudomonas aeruginosasink waste trapsmvR

Identifiers

PMID33674437
PMCPMC8117763
OpenAlexW3134123705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.