Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33674376›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Infection control teams for reducing healthcare-associated infections in hospitals and other healthcare settings: a protocol for systematic review.

Moe Moe Thandar, Sadatoshi Matsuoka, Obaidur Rahman, Erika Ota, Toshiaki Baba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Infection control nurse: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Designing an optimal infection prevention service: Part 1.Journal of infection prevention · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moe Moe ThandarBureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sadatoshi MatsuokaBureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan smatsuoka@it.ncgm.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-9671
Obaidur RahmanDepartment of Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Erika OtaDepartment of Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki BabaBureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-7027
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPSt. Luke's International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are a worldwide problem. Infection control in hospitals is usually implemented by an infection control team (ICT). Initially, ICTs consisted of doctors, nurses, epidemiologists and microbiologists; then, in the 1980s, the infection control link nurse (ICLN) system was introduced. ICTs (with or without the ICLN system) work to ensure the health and well-being of patients and healthcare professionals in hospitals and other healthcare settings, such as acute care clinics, community health centres and care homes. No previous study has reported the effects of ICTs on HCAIs. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of ICTs with or without the ICLN system in reducing HCAIs in hospitals and other healthcare settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a comprehensive literature search for randomised controlled trials in four databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes are: patient-based/clinical outcomes (rate of HCAIs, death due to HCAIs and length of hospital stay) and staff-based/behavioural outcomes (compliance with infection control practices). The secondary outcomes include the costs to the healthcare system or patients due to extended lengths of stay. Following data extraction, we will assess the risk of bias by using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk of bias tool. If data can be pooled across all the studies, we will perform a meta-analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will use publicly available data, and therefore, ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. The findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020172173.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansInfection ControlMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topiceducation & training (see medical education & training)health & safetyinfection control

Identifiers

PMID33674376
PMCPMC7938975
OpenAlexW3133518512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.