Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33673864›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2021

Ticks infesting humans and associated pathogens: a cross-sectional study in a 3-year period (2017-2019) in northwest Italy.

Tania Audino, Alessandra Pautasso, Veronica Bellavia, Valerio Carta, Alessio Ferrari, Federica Verna, Carla Grattarola, Barbara Iulini, Maria Domenica Pintore, Mauro Bardelli and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Silent Spread ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  13. Prevalence of Lyme Disease and Relapsing FeverPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Serology forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Veterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tania Audino *Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra Pautasso *Azienda Sanitaria Locale 1 Imperiese (ASL1 Imperiese), Sanremo, Italy.
Veronica BellaviaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Valerio CartaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Alessio FerrariIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Federica VernaAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti (ASL AT), Asti, Italy.
Carla GrattarolaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Barbara IuliniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Maria Domenica PintoreAzienda Sanitaria Locale del Verbano Cusio Ossola (ASL VCO), Omegna, Italy.
Mauro BardelliAzienda Sanitaria Locale del Verbano Cusio Ossola (ASL VCO), Omegna, Italy.
Germano CassinaAzienda Sanitaria Locale del Verbano Cusio Ossola (ASL VCO), Omegna, Italy.
Laura TomassoneUniversita' Degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Simone PelettoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Valeria BlandaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri", Palermo, Italy.
Alessandra TorinaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri", Palermo, Italy.
Maria CaramelliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Cristina CasaloneIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Rosanna DesiatoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle D'Aosta, Turin, Italy. rosanna.desiato@izsto.it.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta · ITASL Roma · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sicilia · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti · ITOspedale di Sanremo · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Torino (IT) 19D01Ministero della Salute 19CEAMinistero della Salute IZS PLV 15/16 RC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTick-borne diseases are common throughout Europe. Ticks transmit pathogens to the host while feeding and together with mosquitoes, they are major vectors of infectious agents worldwide. In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the incidence of tick-bite events and tick-borne disease in northwest Italy, but information on the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from humans remains scarce. To fill this gap, we report here the prevalence of tick bites and tick-borne pathogens documented for humans in Piedmont, northwest Italy, in the 3-year period 2017-2019.

methodsTicks attached to humans during 2017-2019 were collected from residents of urban and rural area by physicians and veterinarians working with local veterinary agencies. All ticks (n = 1290) were morphologically identified to the species level. A subset of ticks removed from children (age 0-18 years) and the elderly (> 70 years), both age groups considered to be at-risk populations, was screened by biomolecular analysis to detect pathogens (e.g. Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., Anaplasma spp.). Pathogen identity was confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

resultsTicks were taxonomically assigned to ten species of six genera (Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus). Most belonged to the genus Ixodes: 1009 ticks (78.22%) were classified as Ixodes ricinus. A subset of 500 ticks collected from the two at-risk populations were subjected to PCR assay to determine the presence of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., and Anaplasma spp. The overall prevalence of infection was 22.8% (n = 114; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.19-26.73%), meaning that at least one pathogen was detected: Rickettsia spp. (prevalence 15%, n = 76; 95% CI 12.17-18.65%); Borrelia spp. (prevalence 6.4%, n = 32; 95% CI 4.42-8.92%); and Anaplasma spp. (prevalence 1.2%, n = 6; 95% CI 0.44-2.6%).

conclusionsOur data underline the importance of surveillance in the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases and the implementation of strategies to control tick infestation and associated pathogens.

Indexed as

AdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overAnaplasmaAnimalsBites and StingsBorreliaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDisease VectorsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornItalyAnaplasma phagocytophilumBorrelia spp.PCRRickettsia spp.Tick-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID33673864
PMCPMC7934501
OpenAlexW3134619432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.